Visitors Now: | |
Total Visits: | |
Total Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
New observations of tiny dark clouds in space point out another possibility: that some free-floating planets formed on their own.
A team of astronomers from Sweden and Finland used several telescopes to observe the Rosette Nebula, a huge cloud of gas and dust 4600 light years from Earth in the constellation Monoceros (the Unicorn).
Credit: Chalmers University
They collected observations in radio waves with the 20-metre telescope at Onsala Space Observatory in Sweden, in submillimetre waves with APEX in Chile, and in infrared light with the New Technology Telescope (NTT) at ESO’s La Silla Observatory in Chile.
Credit: Chalmers University
Nebula is home to more than a hundred of these tiny clouds – we call them globulettes”, says Gösta Gahm, astronomer at Stockholm University, who led the project.
“They are very small, each with diameter less than 50 times the distance between the Sun and Neptune. Previously we were able to estimate that most of them are of planetary mass, less than 13 times Jupiter’s mass. Now we have much more reliable measures of mass and density for a large number of these objects, and we have also precisely measured how fast they are moving relative to their environment”, he says.
“We found that the globulettes are very dense and compact, and many of them have very dense cores. That tells us that many of them will collapse under their own weight and form free-floating planets. The most massive of them can form so-called brown dwarfs”, says team member Carina Persson, astronomer at Chalmers University of Technology.
Brown dwarfs, sometimes called failed stars, are bodies whose mass lies between that of planets and stars.
The study shows that the tiny clouds are moving outwards through the Rosette Nebula at high speed, about 80 000 kilometres per hour.
”We think that these small, round clouds have broken off from tall, dusty pillars of gas which were sculpted by the intense radiation from young stars. They have been accelerated out from the centre of the nebula thanks to pressure from radiation from the hot stars in its centre”, explains Minja Mäkelä, astronomer at the University of Helsinki.
According to Gösta Gahm and his team, the tiny dark clouds are being thrown out of the Rosette Nebula. During the history of the Milky Way, countless millions of nebulae like the Rosette have bloomed and faded away. In all of these, many globulettes would have formed.
Credit: Chalmers University
“If these tiny, round clouds form planets and brown dwarfs, they must be shot out like bullets into the depths of the Milky Way”, says Gösta Gahm.
“There are so many of them that they could be a significant source of the free-floating planets that have been discovered in recent years”, he says.
Picture to the right: Astronomers have found that tiny, round, dark clouds called globulettes have the right characteristics to form free-floating planets. The graph shows the spectrum of one of the globulettes taken at the 20-metre telescope at Onsala Space Observatory. Radio waves from molecules of carbon monoxide (13CO) give information on the mass and structure of these clouds. ESO/M. Mäkelä
Astronomers know of almost 900 planets which orbit around other stars than the Sun, but free-floating planets have also been found. Some have been discovered using a technique called microlensing, in which the planet is found when it passes in front of a background star, temporarily making it look brighter. This is an effect predicted by Einstein’s theory of general relativity, in which the light from the star is bent when the planet passes in front of it, a so-called gravitational lens. Scientists have estimated that the number of free-floating planets in our galaxy may exceed 200 billion.
The study has been published in the article Mass and motion of globulettes in the Rosette Nebula in the July issue of the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics. The team consists of Gösta Gahm (Stockholm University, Sweden), Carina M. Persson (Onsala Space Observatory at Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden), Minja M. Mäkelä (Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Finland) and Lauri K. Haikala (Finnish Centre for Astronomy with ESO [FINCA], University of Turku, Finland).
Robert Cumming, astronomer and communications officer, Onsala Space Observatory at Chalmers University of Technology
Gösta Gahm, astronomer, Stockholm University
Carina Persson, astronomer, Onsala Space Observatory at Chalmers University of Technology
Minja Mäkelä, Department of Physics, University of Helsinki
Wow… 200 Billion rogue planets…and yet, they get blindsided by (1) little ol’ asteroid exploding over Russia? Or… these eggheads cannot accurately locate a large planetary mass (or 2) impacting / increasing our bizarre global weather patterns, earthquake volumes & intensities let alone explain why sinkholes are popping up all over the place as planetary gravitational fields collide and causing planets to “wobble” more than normal… hmmm?
I know… pure crazy talk… perhaps.
But these are all real events anybody can see if patient enough to observe, record, research history & patterns of. Event don’t happen in a vacumn… there’s always a source. And good luck getting a straight answer from gv’t sources like NASA… And yes, some event are simply natural… but when you start seeing higher volumes and extremes outside normal… it’s time to pull your head from the sand. Especially when you see them and the same gvt sources deny, remove or hide their existence? If it’s all fake… why hide the facts? Why not simply discredit them?
NASA is busy pointing everybody to look left while the real action takes place on the right… (up to 180 degrees in the wrong direction…) it’s called Misdirection… why? Well, the short answer is… “I guess they think you & I are too stupid to understand… and would send billions of people in blind panic… if the truth was told…” But, as long as it’s a crazy talk “Conspiracy Theory”… it’s laughable. Go back to sleep…
We see, hear and believe what we choose to believe… and normalize the rest. Natural events don’t always happen in Hollywood style “suddenly”… they can creep up on us over time. But if we them as a NEW NORMAL… we tend to overlook them… and that could spell disaster for many. I don’t know if Planet X is real or not… I can only see that Earth is misbehaving… and something got her bugged. I wish NASA would focus more on more nearby issues again…
and this means what? That children don’t need parents?
Sorry, j programmer, they do need parents.