Visitors Now: | |
Total Visits: | |
Total Stories: |
A binary star is a star system consisting of two stars orbiting around their common center of mass. The brighter star is called the primary and the other is its companion star, comes/ˈkoʊmiːz/, or secondary. Research between the early 19th century and today suggests that many stars are part of either binary star systems or star systems with more than two stars, called multiple star systems. The term double star may be used synonymously with binary star, but more generally, a double star may be either a binary star or an optical double star which consists of two stars with no physical connection but which appear close together in the sky as seen from the Earth. A double star may be determined to be optical if its components have sufficiently different proper motions or radial velocities, or if parallax measurements reveal its two components to be at sufficiently different distances from the Earth. Most known double stars have not yet been determined to be either bound binary star systems or optical doubles.
Binary star systems are very important in astrophysics because calculations of their orbits allow the masses of their component stars to be directly determined, which in turn allows other stellar parameters, such as radius and density, to be indirectly estimated. This also determines an empirical mass-luminosity relationship (MLR) from which the masses of single stars can be estimated.
Binary stars are often detected optically, in which case they are called visual binaries. Many visual binaries have long orbital periods of several centuries or millennia and therefore have orbits which are uncertain or poorly known. They may also be detected by indirect techniques, such as spectroscopy (spectroscopic binaries) or astrometry(astrometric binaries). If a binary star happens to orbit in a plane along our line of sight, its components will eclipseand transit each other; these pairs are called eclipsing binaries, or, as they are detected by their changes in brightness during eclipses and transits, photometric binaries.
If components in binary star systems are close enough they can gravitationally distort their mutual outer stellar atmospheres. In some cases, these close binary systems can exchange mass, which may bring their evolution to stages that single stars cannot attain. Examples of binaries are Sirius and Cygnus X-1 (of which one member is probably a black hole). Binary stars are also common as the nuclei of many planetary nebulae, and are the progenitors of both novae and type Ia supernovae.
The term binary was first used in this context by Sir William Herschel in 1802,[1] when he wrote:[2]
“If, on the contrary, two stars should really be situated very near each other, and at the same time so far insulated as not to be materially affected by the attractions of neighbouring stars, they will then compose a separate system, and remain united by the bond of their own mutual gravitation towards each other. This should be called a real double star; and any two stars that are thus mutually connected, form the binary sidereal system which we are now to consider.”
By the modern definition, the term binary star is generally restricted to pairs of stars which revolve around a common centre of mass. Binary stars which can be resolved with a telescope or interferometric methods are known as visual binaries.[3][4] For most of the known visual binary stars one whole revolution has not been observed yet, they are observed to have travelled along a curved path or a partial arc.[5]
The more general term double star is used for pairs of stars which are seen to be close together in the sky.[1] This distinction is rarely made in languages other than English.[3] Double stars may be binary systems or may be merely two stars that appear to be close together in the sky but have vastly different true distances from the Sun. The latter are termed optical doubles or optical pairs.[6]
Since the invention of the telescope, many pairs of double stars have been found. Early examples include Mizarand Acrux. Mizar, in the Big Dipper (Ursa Major), was observed to be double by Giovanni Battista Riccioli in 1650[7][8] (and probably earlier by Benedetto Castelli and Galileo).[9] The bright southern star Acrux, in theSouthern Cross, was discovered to be double by Father Fontenay in 1685.[7]
John Michell was the first to suggest that double stars might be physically attached to each other when he argued in 1767 that the probability that a double star was due to a chance alignment was small.[10][11] William Herschel began observing double stars in 1779 and soon thereafter published catalogs of about 700 double stars.[12] By 1803, he had observed changes in the relative positions in a number of double stars over the course of 25 years, and concluded that they must be binary systems;[13] the first orbit of a binary star, however, was not computed until 1827, when Félix Savary computed the orbit of Xi Ursae Majoris.[14] Since this time, many more double stars have been catalogued and measured. The Washington Double Star Catalog, a database of visual double stars compiled by the United States Naval Observatory, contains over 100,000 pairs of double stars,[15] including optical doubles as well as binary stars. Orbits are known for only a few thousand of these double stars,[16] and most have not been ascertained to be either true binaries or optical double stars.[17] This can be determined by observing the relative motion of the pairs. If the motion is part of an orbit, or if the stars have similarradial velocities and the difference in their proper motions is small compared to their common proper motion, the pair is probably physical.[18] One of the tasks that remains for visual observers of double stars is to obtain sufficient observations to prove or disprove gravitational connection.
If you liked this story don’t forget to hit the RECOMMEND CONTRIBUTOR button at the top of the page so that I can bring you more stories like this. I don’t get paid and it is a way to say thanks. Thanks so much!!!
This is LIES.
LOL. On the video that is exactly what happens if you take a photo of the sun or the moon through two glass sheets of glass. Next time you see the moon through your double glazing, note there are two moons. The further the sheets of glass are apart, the further the duplicate appears from the original.
So, it peaks out to show itself as an enormous approaching planet, resembling a second sun, but then what…. hides behind the sun again? At that size, it’s not remotely plausible that it could possibly remain constantly aligned behind the sun, hidden from view most of the time, and even if it could, it sure as hell wouldnt play peak-a-boo with us. People really buy this? Rational thought is overrated?
No…It gets caught in the Solar Prominence and we are blinded to see it. It is set to cross between the sun and the moon. I’m not trying to sell this to you if that’s what you think. I’ve been on this thing for some years now. I agree, Rational thought is overrated. What we do know is that the sun is not, I repeat not in a stable orbit, it does not stay still like eveyone wants to believe. Neither is the earth and when we get hit by CMEs and such we shift positions. Have you looked at the sun and moon lately??? My friend something is out of wack compared to a couple of months ago. ANyway I’m not trying to downplay your theory. I’m just saying that theres alot more to seeing this thing that anyone expects. It’s all about timeing. NASA will not tell you this. They know exactly where it is. What more can I tell you except be aware of what is happening Globably. Earthquakes. Meteors, comets, Tectonic plate movements, things like this will clue you in. And most importantly, watch the sunsets and the sunrises that’s is when you’ll really be able to see it…