Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Werner Sombart on the Jewish Character

Tuesday, January 15, 2013 17:04
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Werner_Sombart_vor_1930.jpg
(left, The distinguished German sociologist Werner Sombart, 1863-1941, was an informed and generally  sympathetic observer of the Jewish people.)


In his book “The Jews & Modern Capitalism,” (1911) German sociologist Werner Sombart credits Jews for the rise of capitalism which he regards as the most dynamic force in the modern world.

In the excerpt below (from pp. 183-7) he explores the Jewish character which he describes as being overly intellectual and goal-oriented. 



“His greatest interest is always in the result of a thing, not in the thing itself. It is un-Jewish to regard any activity, be it what you will, as an end in itself; un-Jewish to live your life without having any purpose, to leave all to chance; un-Jewish to get harmless pleasure out of Nature.”

by Werner Sombart

(edited & abridged by henrymakow.com) 

The intellectuality of the Jew is so strong that it tends to develop at the expense of other mental qualities, and the mind is apt to become one-sided. 
 
The Jew certainly sees remarkably clearly, but he does not see much.

He does not think of his environment as something alive, and that is why
he has lost the true conception of life, of its oneness, of its being an
organism, a natural growth. In short, he has lost the true conception of
the personal side of life. General experience must surely support this
view; but if other proofs are demanded they will be found in the pecu-
liarities of Jewish law, which abolished personal relationships and replaced them by impersonal, abstract connections or activities or aims.
 
Hence the [Jewish] lack of sympathy for every status where the nexus is a
personal one. The Jews’ whole being is opposed to all that is usually
understood by chivalry, to all sentimentality, knight-errantry, feudalism, patriarchalism. Nor does he comprehend a social order based on relationships such as these. “Estates of the realm” and craft organizations are a loathing to him. 

The conception of the universe in the mind of such an intellectual people must perforce have been that of a structure well-ordered in accordance with reason. By the aid of reason, therefore, they sought to understand the world; they were rationalists, both in theory and in practice.
 
Now as soon as a strong consciousness of the ego attaches itself to
the predominating intellectuality in the thinking being, he will tend to
group the world round that ego. In other words, he will look at the world
from the point of view of end, or goal, or purpose. 

Take any expression of the Jewish genius and you will be certain to
find in it this teleological tendency, which has sometimes been called
extreme subjectivity. Whether or no the Indo-Germanic races are objec-
tive and the Semitic subjective,certain it is that the Jews are the most
subjective of peoples. The Jew never loses himself in the outer world,
never sinks in the depth of the cosmos, never soars in the endless realms
of thought, but, as Jellinek well puts it, dives below the surface to seek
for pearls.

He brings everything into relation with his ego. He is for ever asking why, what for, what will it bring? Cui bono? His greatest interest is always in the result of a thing, not in the thing itself. It is un-Jewish to regard any activity, be it what you will, as an end in itself; un-Jewish to live your life without having any purpose, to leave all to chance; un-Jewish to get harmless pleasure out of Nature. 

The Jew has taken all that is in Nature and made of it “the loose pages of a text-book of ethics which shall advance the higher moral life.” The Jewish religion, as we have already seen, is teleological in its aim; in each of its regulations it as the ethical norm in view. The entire universe, in the Jew’s eyes, is something that was made in accordance with a plan. 
No term is more familiar to the ear of the Jew than Tachlis, which 
means purpose, aim, end or goal. If you are to do anything it must have
a tachlis; life itself, whether as a whole or in its single activities, must
have some tachlis, and so must the universe. Those who assert that the
meaning of Life, of the World, is not tachlis but tragedy, the Jew will
reckon as foolish visionaries.
 
How deeply the teleological view of things is embedded in the nature of the Jew may be seen in the case of those of them who, like the Chassidim, pay no attention to the needs of practical life because “there is no purpose in them.” There is no purpose in making a living, and so they let their wives and children starve, and devote themselves to the study of their sacred books.
 
When this attitude of mind that seeks for a purpose in all things is
united with a strong will, with a large fund of energy (as is generally the
case with the Jew), it ceases to be merely a point of view; it becomes a
policy. The man sets himself a goal and makes for it, allowing nothing
whatever to turn him aside from his course; he is determined, if you like,
stiff-necked. Heine in characterizing his people called it stubbornness,
and Goethe said that the essence of the Jewish character was energy and
the pursuit of direct ends.

 



Source:

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.