Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By Sebastian Clouth
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Soda War: Judge Strikes Down Bloomberg’s ‘Soda Ban’ in NYC

Monday, March 11, 2013 19:51
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

 

The three current drink sizes at one Subway location (40, 30, and 21 ounces, respectively) would all be too big under the large sugary drink ban, set to start on March 12 but which has now been delayed. (Deborah Yun/Epoch Times)

 

The three current drink sizes at one Subway location (40, 30, and 21 ounces, respectively) would all be too big under the large sugary drink ban, set to start on March 12 but which has now been delayed. (Deborah Yun/Epoch Times)

 

NEW YORK—Judge Milton Tingling of the New York State Supreme Court, ruled the law, which would have gone into effect on Tuesday, was against the City Charter.  

[Related: Bloomberg Confident He’ll Get Large Sugary Drink Decision Overturned]

The law would have banned establishments that get letter grades from the city to serve drinks larger than 16 ounces that contain more than 50 calories, encompassing a wide range of beverages such as soda and partial fruit juice.

Tingling said in his ruling that the city violated the City Charter, partly because establishments under the purview of the city would be under the ban but establishments under the purview of the state—such as 7-11 stores and its Big Gulp cup sizes—would not be under the ban.

The loopholes in this rule effectively defeat the state purpose of the rule,” Tingling wrote in his ruling. “It is arbitrary and capricious because it applies to some but not all food establishments in the city, it excludes other beverages that have significantly higher concentrations of sugar sweeteners and/or calories on suspect grounds, and the loopholes inherent in the ruling, including but not limited to no limitations on re-fills, defeat and/or serve to guy the purpose of the rule.”

Much of the language Tingling used was similar to that used by groups against the ban, including soda manufacturers and some small business groups.

[Related: The Cost of Complying With NYC’s Soda Ban]

At the same time, Tingling agreed with the city that there is a problem with obesity. 

The respondents in this action all state, in some shape or form, ‘There is an obesity epidemic among New York City Residents which severely affects the public’s health’ as the basis for the passage of 81.53,” he wrote. “The words ‘epidemic and ‘obesity’ are neither examined nor explained as much as they are stated as fact.”

The respondents claim 57.5 percent of adult New York City residents are overweight or obese. Nearly 40 percent of New York City schoolchildren (K-8 grade) are overweight or obese. The latest figures from 2011 show 23.7 percent of New York City adults are obese,” Tingling wrote.

Commissioner of Health Thomas Farley released the following statement:

Without a portion cap on sugary drinks, it would be harder to tackle an obesity epidemic that kills more New Yorkers than anything other than smoking and causes misery for many thousands more who suffer from heart disease, diabetes and other debilitating illnesses. Sugary drinks are a leading cause of this epidemic. Today’s decision threatens the health of New Yorkers, but we are confident that we will win on appeal.”

*Republished with permission from The Epoch Times

 

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.