Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By Off The Grid News
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Controversial New Law Allows Gun Confiscation — Without Any Notice

Wednesday, January 13, 2016 4:03
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

An Exclusive You Have To See: The Last Frontier of Free Press Is Here! No More Censorship, Unlike YouTube and Others!

Controversial New Law Allows Gun Confiscation -- Without Any Notice

Image source: FreeImages.com

A controversial bill that gives judges the power to strip California residents of their Second Amendment rights went into effect January 1.

The new law, previously known as Assembly Bill (AB) 1014, is aimed at the mentally ill, although critics say its language is so broad that innocent gunowners will be targeted.

“Under AB 1014, Second Amendment rights would be stripped away on as little as hearsay,” a petition on the website of the Firearms Policy Coalition, a gun rights group states. “With as little as a misunderstood Facebook post, your gun rights could be STRIPPED AWAY and your LIFE TURNED UPSIDE DOWN.”

Supporters of the law disagree, and claim it will prevent mass shootings.

How To Hide Your Guns, And Other Off-Grid Caches…

“AB 1014 provides an effective tool to get guns out of the hands of loved ones to avoid these tragedies,” the law’s co-sponsor, State Assembly member Nancy Skinner, told The Los Angeles Times. Skinner said the law is aimed at preventing tragedies such as the May 2014 mass shooting in Isla Vista which was carried out by Elliot Rodger, a man who was allegedly mentally ill.

Source: http://www.offthegridnews.com/current-events/controversial-new-law-allows-gun-confiscation-without-any-notice/

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 1 comment
  • Man

    it is an addition to an Existing law that regulates a person subject to a domestic violence protective order from owning or possessing a firearm while that order is in effect.

    The addition is that now the law can confiscate the gun of the person who has violated the domestic violence protective order (so person using a gun to endanger the person who has placed the order).

    how is that wrong?

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.