NEVER TRUST AN ATTORNEY TO TELL YOU THE TRUTH AND HERE IS WHY!!
January 14, 2016
THE CLEAR FRAUD; SEDITION, & TREASONOUS ACTS OF THE BAR
This fraudulent, /seditious, & treasonous act, of the Courts’/Bar members telling plaintiff and defendants alike, that the Court; was appointing an attorney, in plaintiff’s/defendants benefit. This fraud is an outrage and now known to be patently false/a lie on its face. Please see the following it explains far better the fraud/sedition, & treason. That an attorney’s presence is to put one in the state court’s jurisdiction, so they can prevent one from challenging, the jurisdiction putting the people at the magistrates non-existing mercy as the bar clear objective is the over throw of Americas Constitutional form of Government. By convicting the people of fictional crimes to remove their right of gun ownership, so the American people can be Concorde and enslaved without a shot fired. Even case law denotes the truth. Please see
The U.S. Supreme Court observed in its unanimous decision in Kay v. Ehrler, 499 U.S. 432, that a lawmaking body may instead prefer to discourage attorneys from electing to appear in Propia persona because such self-representation may often conflict with the general public and legislative policy favoring the effective and successful prosecution of meritorious claims. The high court observed that ‘Even a skilled lawyer who represents himself is at a disadvantage in contested litigation. Ethical considerations may make it inappropriate for him to appear as a witness. He is deprived of the judgment of an independent third party in framing the theory of the case, evaluating alternative methods of presenting the evidence, cross-examining hostile witnesses, formulating legal arguments, and in making sure that reason, rather than emotion, dictates the proper tactical response to unforeseen developments in the courtroom. The adage that ‘a attorney who represents himself has a fool for a client’ is the product of years of experience by seasoned litigators.. Id. at 437-438
An appearance may be in “Propia persona”, and need not be by attorney.
Obs. ‘In his own person.’ It is a rule in pleading those pleas to the jurisdiction of the court must be pleaded in Propia persona, because, if pleaded by attorney, they admit the jurisdiction, as an attorney is an officer of the court, and he is presumed to plead after having obtained leave, which admits the jurisdiction).
This ruling is clear proof the attorneys only role is to fraudulently aide the Bar member/judge’s court in getting jurisdiction. The following rulings explain the criminal acts in much greater detail the rulings shown; leave no doubt of the subversive actions of the bar and its member’s intention of destroying America from within. Please see the following
“The attorney’s first duty is to the courts…not to the client.” U.S.v Franks D.C.N.J. 53F.2d 128). Here again people have been repeatedly told the attorney is for their benefit to insure a fair and impartial hearing; this is clear fraud.
“Clients are also called “wards of the court” in regard to their relationship with their attorneys.”Spilker v. Hankin, 158 F.2d 35, 58U.S.App.D.C. 206. This ruling clearly shows the attorney’s presence does not guarantee a fair and impartial hearing but rather secures/guarantees defendants or plaintiffs are at the mercy of the Magistrate. The preponderance of fraud will only grow as you will see.
(Wards of court. are Infants and persons of unsound mind). Davis Committee v. Loney, 290 Ky. 644, 162 S.W.2d 189, 190.
Did you get that? An Attorneys first duty is not to the people they are supposedly representing, & when you have an Attorney you are either considered insane or an infant.
This is an incredible fraud/sedition & treason being perpetrated on the American people, by members of the BAR who perform such fraud/sedition treason daily there is no doubt, who the real criminals are now! This violates 18 U.S.CODE§2384-SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY and is clearly sedition against the American people and the United States of America. The bar members repeatedly ignores the Constitution of the United States in open court violating Title 18 USC 2381 Capitol Felony Treason. They claim that saying our paper work is fugitive allows them the right to ignore the US Constitution. I David Roach hereby also demand that with the above stated law the Secretary of state notify the clerk in case numbers 54C01-9602-DR-00057 in Montgomery County Crawfordsville Indiana & 1:14-cv-1196 SEB-DKL in the Southern District Court in Indiana of my David Roach’s standing as an American National with 11th Amendment immunity.
It is no wonder as to why the 81st congress deemed the BAR/lawyers guild a Communist Organization in 1950; in the congressional report on the lawyer’s guild. When one reads the report it becomes quickly understood the BAR was acting in support of Adolph Hitler, as the bar was caught red handed, shipping ammunitions, & attacking the American public school system, in order to dumb down American children. Yet despite all the facts members of the BAR are still practicing their fraudulent/seditious & treasonous acts daily & even seem proud, of their historical ties with the world’s 2nd largest mass murderer in history Adolph Hitler 1st being the International Bankers of course, which the present financial crisis has shown the historical connections here as well, being the BAR was founded & started by the bankers who can be shown to have a death toll over 100 million people directly, as a result of actions taken by the international bankers from WW 2 till today. So it’s clear, the bar and its members seek not justice, but domination, and the death, of all who will not be put upon bended knee, to them, and their creators (The International Bankers).
18 U.S.C. § 4. Such activity has been a federal crime since the First Congress, for “the common law recognized a duty to raise the `hue and cry’ and report felonies to the authorities. . . . It is apparent from this statute, as well as from our history and that of England, that concealment of crime and agreements to do so are not looked upon with favor. Such conduct deserves no encomium.” Branzburg v. Hayes,408 U.S. 665, 696-97 (1972) (citation omitted).
Misprision of Felony involves both knowledge of a crime and some affirmative act of concealment or participation, and the Courts have concluded that ‘misprision of felony’ is a crime of moral turpitude because it necessarily involves an affirmative act of concealment or participation in a felony, behavior that runs contrary to accepted societal duties and involves dishonest or fraudulent activity. The Supreme Court observed that: Concealment of crime has been condemned throughout our history… Although the term “misprision of felony” now has an archaic ring, gross indifference to the duty to report known criminal behavior remains a badge of irresponsible citizenship.
Written by: David Roach
Submitted by: Wynter Moon with permission of David Roach
