| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
When Law Enforcers obey the Unlawful … R.E. Sutherland, M.Ed.
PRESS RELEASE ** FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**NOT SPAM
Date February 17, 2016
Contact: R.E. Sutherland, M.Ed./sciences
Email: [email protected]
Copyrighted. Permission is granted to post or redistribute article in its entirety. All rights reserved.
DISCLAIMER: The following is not intended as legal, financial, or medical advice; instead, it is sent for Education and Discussion Purposes Only … the Reader is responsible for all thoughts and actions gained from introspection.
++++++
SUBJECT: When Law Enforcers obey the Unlawful
By R.E. Sutherland, M.Ed. /sciences
INTRODUCTION: All empires in history have fallen when the balance of power changes. Great empires form when power flows from the people to the leaders. Great empires fall when the power flows from the leaders to the people. The basis of organization in every empire is the rules by which the people fashion their behavior, and those rules are called “law.” Hence, it is time to examine where the United States of America is today with respect to her status in law.
FIRST: The legal definition of “unlawful”.
QUOTE: Not conforming to, permitted by, or recognized by law or rules: the use of unlawful violence
Source: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/unlawful
QUOTE: Definition of UNLAWFUL: That which is contrary to law. “Unlawful” and “illegal” are frequently used as synonymous terms, but, in the proper sense of the word, “unlawful,” as applied to promises, agreements, considerations, and the like, denotes that they are ineffectual in law because they involve acts which, although not illegal, i. e., positively forbidden, are disapproved of by the law, and are therefore not recognized as the ground of legal rights, either because they are immoral or because they are against public policy. It is on this ground that contracts in restraint of marriage or of trade are generally void. Sweet. And see Hagerman v. Buchanan, 45 N. J. Eq. 292, 17 Atl. 946, 14 Am. St Rep. 732; Tatum v. State, 66 Ala. 467; Johnson v. State, 66 Ohio St. 59. 63 N. E. 607. 61 L. R. A. 277, 90 Am. St. Rep. 564; Pinder v. State, 27 Fla. 370, 8 South. 837, 26 Am. St. Rep. 75; MacDaniel v. U. S
Source: http://thelawdictionary.org/unlawful/
SECOND: The legal definition of “legal”.
Definition: What is LEGAL ENTITY?
QUOTE: “A lawful or legally standing association, corporation, partnership, proprietorship, trust, or individual. Has legal capacity to (1) enter into agreements or contracts, (2) assume obligations, (3) incur and pay debts, (4) sue and be sued in its own right, and (5) to be accountable for illegal activities.”
Source: http://thelawdictionary.org/legal-entity/
THIRD: What is Common Law?
QUOTE: What Is Common Law?, Written by James Hirby | Fact checked by The Law Dictionary staff
“Contract law regulates everything from buying a coffee to trading on the stock exchange.
A contract is An agreement between two or more competent parties in which an offer is made and accepted, and each party benefits. Agreements can either be formal or informal, written, oral, or implied for example, by long term business relationship. Examples of contracts include leases, promissory notes, rental agreement etc. There are four necessary components to make a contractual agreement; an offer, acceptance of the offer, the intention to enter into a legally binding agreement, and consideration…” (Continues)
Source: http://thelawdictionary.org/article/what-is-common-law/
FOURTH: What is Tort Law?
Definition of TORT: What is TORT?
QUOTE: “Wrong ; injury; the opposite of right So called, according to Lord Coke, be cause it is wrested, or crooked, being contrary to that which is right and straight. Co. Litt 1586. In modern practice, tort is constantly used as au English word to denote a wrong or wrongful act, for which an action will lie, as distinguished from a contract. 3 Bl. Comm. 117. A tort is a legal wrong committed upon the person or property independent of con- tract. It may be either (1) a direct invasion of some legal right of the individual; (2) the infraction of some public duty by which special damage accrues to the individual; (3) the violation of some private obligation by which like damage accrues to the individual. In the former case, no special damage is necessary to entitle the party to recover. In the two latter cases, such damage is necessary. Code Ga. 18S2,…”
Source: http://thelawdictionary.org/tort/
FIFTH: What is Ex Post Facto?
QUOTE: What is EX POST FACTO LAW?
A law passed after the occurrence of a fact or commission of an act, which retrospectively changes the legal consequences or relations of such’ factor deed. By Const. U. S. art. 1,
Source: http://thelawdictionary.org/ex-post-facto-law/
SIXTH: HISTORY not now taught in Public Schools…The Cover Up of the Truth, by The Informer, posted on Against The Grain
QUOTE: “….Because the Publishers were bought out by the Black Popes operatives in this country so it was eliminated. So in the long run the Americans are still controlled by the Vatican. And the crowns you read about in the book were not the Kings unless specifically named, they were the Bankers (Exchequers) of Europe that controlled all as they do in America. In a point of fact, all the owners of the federal Reserve are the Exchequers and are the foreign controlled elite of the Vatican. The same ones, not the same persons, that were the First Bank of the United States. Maybe you missed it, but if you reread the article where this is a country named America not the United States. To most Americans they believe the country is United States. Then why, of all reason are you called an American and not a United Statesman or something leaving America out? Think a little. If you know the definition of the word “OF” you will know just what the phrase “The United States OF America” is saying. When the corporate colonies became States they retained their corporate character. But of course the men and women at that time was kept in the dark that they were owned by the Vatican and no longer were British subjects and the Vatican proceeded to take over the States, which all were his to begin with, and created the Corporation of the United States. My book the Myth and the Reality tells how the Vatican did this recapturing of his possessions and why we never won the war against The British. We fought the front man for the owner that’s all. We won the battle and not the entire war. That is a religious war still ongoing between the Lord and Satan. The Vatican’s organizational Structure I included in my book shows Lucifer as top boss of the Vatican’s both Black and white Popes. They alone created the Religion of ISLAM for a distinct purpose. That is now coming to fruition after all these centauries. The Vatican looks 200 to 500 years in the future. Do you look that far or even 1/10th that time into the future so your offspring will have it better?
What were the names, founding dates, and connections to the King of England by the original 13 colonies?
ANSWER:
1067-Virginia – Charter by King to the Virginia Company of London
1620-Massachusetts – Charter granted by the King to the Puritans
1623- New Hampshire – King appointed Council of New England for settlement
1624- New York – Charter by King to Duke of York
1622-Connecticut – Charter by King to John Winthrop
1634-Maryland – Charter by King to Lord Baltimore
1636-Rhode Island – King granted “Charter of Rhode Island & Providence Plantations”
1638-Delaware – Charter by King to Duke of York
1643-Pennsylvania – Grant by King to William Penn
1653-North Carolina – Grant by King to Sir Robert Heath
1660-New Jersey – Grant by King to Duke of York
1670-South Carolina – Grant by King to Eight “Lords Proprietors”
1733-Georgia – Grant by King to a Corporation entitled: “Trustees for Establishing the Colony of Georgia in America [SOURCE: World Book Encyclopedia (WBE)]…” (End quote)
SOURCE for article: file:///C:/Users/Owner/Desktop/My%20Documents/INFORMER/2014-history%20not%20taught%20in%20schools.htm
SEVENTH: What is the basis for Law in Western Civilization, as opposed to Asian or Arabic?
QUOTE: “United States – The United States legal system developed primarily out of the English common law system (with the exception of the state of Louisiana, which continued to follow the French civilian system after being admitted to statehood). Some concepts from Spanish law, such as the prior appropriation doctrine and community property, still persist in some US states, particularly those that were part of the Mexican Cession in 1848.
Under the doctrine of federalism, each state has its own separate court system, and the ability to legislate within areas not reserved to the federal government.”
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_history
QUOTE: “…Mediaeval European legal scholars began researching the Roman law and using its concepts[23] and prepared the way for the partial resurrection of Roman law as the modern civil law in a large part of the world.[24] There was, however, a great deal of resistance so that civil law rivaled customary law for much of the late Middle Ages. After the Norman conquest of England, which introduced Norman legal concepts into mediaeval England, the English King’s powerful judges developed a body of precedent that became the common law.[25] In particular, Henry II instituted legal reforms and developed a system of royal courts administered by a small number of judges who lived in Westminster and traveled throughout the kingdom.[26] Henry II also instituted the Assize of Clarendon in 1166, which allowed for jury trials and reduced the number of trials by combat. Louis IX of France also undertook major legal reforms and, inspired by ecclesiastical court procedure, extended Canon-law evidence and inquisitorial-trial systems to the royal courts. Also, judges no longer moved on circuits becoming fixed to their jurisdictions, and jurors were nominated by parties to the legal dispute rather than by the sheriff.[26] In addition, by the 10th century, the Law Merchant, first founded on Scandinavian trade customs, then solidified by the Hanseatic League, took shape so that merchants could trade using familiar standards, rather than the many splintered types of local law. A precursor to modern commercial law, the Law Merchant emphasised the freedom of contract and alienability of property.[27]”
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_history
EIGHTH: What is ECCLESIASTICAL Court?
QUOTE: “An ecclesiastical court, also called court Christian or court spiritual, is any of certain courts having jurisdiction mainly in spiritual or religious matters. In the Middle Ages in many areas of Europe these courts had much wider powers than before the development of nation states. They were experts in interpreting Canon law, a basis of which was the Corpus Juris Civilis of Justinian which is considered the source of the civil law legal tradition.
Catholic Church
The tribunals of the Catholic Church are governed by the Code of Canon Law in the case of the Western Church (Latin or Roman Rite), and the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches in the case of the Eastern Catholic Churches (Byzantine, Ukrainian, Maronite, Melkite, etc.). Both systems of canon law underwent massive revisions in the late 20th century, resulting in the new code for the Latin Rite in 1983, and the compilation for the first time of the Eastern Rite Code in 1990.
First instance
Cases normally originate in the tribunal of the particular church (i.e. the diocese or eparchy) of the parties to the case. This tribunal in canon law is called the tribunal of first instance. The bishop of the church possesses the power to judge for his church; however, since the bishop has many different duties in his diocese, most cases are handled by judges whom he appoints, led by a priest known as the judicial vicar or officialis…”
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecclesiastical_court
NINTH: Do people who serve in branches of Law Enforcement really understand the Law?
QUOTE: “Judicial power in the Church – In instituting the Church as a perfect society, distinct from the civil power and entirely independent of it, Christ gave her legislative, judicial, and executive power to be exercised over her members without any interference on the part of civil society. It does not fall within our scope to prove that the Church is a perfect society, consequently endowed with the above-mentioned power. If one admits the Divine institution of the Church, and the authenticity and authority of the Gospels, he must acknowledge that Christ so constituted His Church as to enable her rulers to make laws and regulations for the faithful conducive to the attainment of eternal happiness. Moreover, as John XXII (1316-34) wisely remarks: “It would he folly to make laws unless there were some one to enforce them” (Cap. un. de Judiciis, II, 1, in Extravag. Comm.). It is evident, therefore, that Christ in conferring legislative power upon the Church also gave judicial and coercive power. In proof of this we have, besides theological arguments, the practice of the Church which explicitly claimed such power, as well in the beginning (2 Corinthians 10:8; 13:2 sqq., etc.) as during the subsequent centuries of her existence; and, moreover, made frequent use of it. Suffice it to recall the institution of canonical penances, the constitutions and laws of so many pontiffs and councils, containing not only positive enactments, but also sanctions to be incurred ipso facto by the rebellious and obstinate, or to be inflicted upon them at the discretion of ecclesiastical superiors.
Now the infliction of punishment certainly presupposes evidence of the crime, since, according to the natural law, no one should be condemned until his guilt has been established. Hence the Church, in making use of her powers of legislation and coercion, must have also exercised judicial power. It is, moreover, historically evident that the Church often exercised these powers either through the Roman pontiff alone, by the agency of his delegates, or through councils, individual bishops, or other judges, ordinary or delegated. St. Paul plainly refers to a perfect judicial procedure when he cautions his disciple Timothy (1 Timothy 5:19) not to receive an accusation against a priest except in the presence of two or three witnesses…”
Source: Ecclesiastical Court, http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04447a.htm
TENTH: Do American people know their own law and what is legal, unlawful, and just plain criminal? Today on every elected board or council there sits a man who must “ATTORN” for the U.S. Government, which is a Corporation. He dictates to them “this is the law”, and then they vote according to his verbal instructions. What they fail to realize is that the members are responsible for deciding what is“law” and what is not law for their area. By failing to understand who these attorneys are, they have literally implemented unlawful rules, which made the legal and binding. Law Enforcers are having to obey them. It is time for all elected bodies to REPEAL everything they have passed all the way back to 1865, and perhaps further back than that. The facts support the observation that the USA is following Ex Post Facto law that came into power after the War of Aggression by President Lincoln and his communist infiltrators.
CONCLUSION: Do you know, or do you just “believe” your own opinion? The First Estate has never changed its position. Our Heavenly King cannot “save America”, because the Men and Women no longer understand, follow, and know the real law. There is a cornerstone.
READ: Matthew 21:33-46
++++++++++++
AUTHOR
R.E. Sutherland, M.Ed./sciences
Freelance Investigative Science Reporter since 1996
24 years – Virginia Licensed Science Teacher (biology, chemistry, physics)
9.3 years-Nuclear lab and Nuclear Radiological Protection Inspector
1992 – Certificate of Completion for “Teaching Nuclear Topics”
Author: American and Russian Alliance of 1858 (ISBN: 13: 9780595215010)
1998 – GOP Primary candidate for SC State Superintendent of Education
2000 – GOP Primary candidate for SC Governor
2004 – Libertarian candidate for US Senate
Web Archive in the Library of Congress:
http://webarchive.loc.gov/lcwa0016/2004*/www.reb4liberty.com/
+++++++++++++
Excellent source information ! I hope people will spend the time to relearn what we need to know ! Thank you for this post. The power resides in the citizens,if they exercise it ! Do you know the difference between a National citizen and a regular 14th Amendment citizen ? This is very important as to your political status and how the court system recognizes you. http://sovereigntoserf.com/category/articles/ http://www.agenda31.org/ http://commonlawyer.com/ http://notime4bull.com/links