Visitors Now: | |
Total Visits: | |
Total Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
By Brittany Yurkovitch on 8/18/2013
Dear Dianne Feinstein,
Recently, a former AP Economics teacher wrote a letter to the massive state surveillance system and since I know you introduced the last internet censorship bill, PIPA, voted to extend the Patriot Act, and introduced legislation to ban semi-automatic rifles or “assault weapons” as you masters of propaganda like to say, I figured I would address this letter directly to you. Hopefully, one of your cronies at the NSA can funnel this letter to you in case it ends up in your spam box.
I am aware that you hard-liner liberals have a difficult time using statistics and logic when it comes to the second amendment. I understand that your position is due to the historical inability of liberals to comprehend facts about crime and self-defense. This anti-self-defense position has always irritated me, but I understand it to be a liberal mental problem. Hopefully, your generous taxpayer- funded insurance plans will cover your debilitating psychiatric deficiency.
However, as a government and economics teacher, you have thoroughly confused me, Dianne. You see, I was under the impression that my job was to teach students about the Constitution and the Bill of Rights so that they can become smart, productive citizens. I thought that you were a Democrat and thus, take the position to strongly defend the First Amendment for everyone (but Christians). So what’s going on with all this NSA garbage you keep spewing? I recently read that you would not support protecting the First Amendment rights of someone like me, at www.RehashedFashion.com, or those of my lesser-achieving students who chooses to voice their opinion because we are not “salaried agents” at a large media company like CNN, CNBC, or FOX.