Three Hundred 9/11 Cops Diagnosed With Cancer With Average Age Of Just 44
Monday, February 6, 2012 23:48
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
Hundreds of young police officers who responded to the 9/11 attacks have been diagnosed with cancer following the horrific tragedy, it has emerged.
A staggering 297 cops – with an average age of just 44 – have been diagnosed, according to figures obtained by The New York Post.
The data shows almost three times the number of officers are applying for cancer-related disability pensions than before the tragedy.
The WTC’s were packed with Asbestos.
Well that blows the SMOKING BAN RIGHT out the window…….
You never walk onto a demolition site without some type of safety gear in place. Every firefighter should know that.
Look at the Oklahoma Federal Building Bombing…a fertilizer bomb made with nitrogen based fertilizer.
Think! Nitrogen will eat the flesh off of you, yet just hours after the bombing, men in regular clothing were digging through the ruins; no haz mat suits (moon suits).
That is absolute proof that there was not any large amounts of fertilizer bought by Timothy McVeigh. Nor was there a truck bomb created from nitrogen based fertilizers.
All part of the scam the US Gov’t put over on the American people.
The abatement costs to remove hundreds of tons of asbestos from the Twin Towers would have been a billion dollars. The Zionist owner took care of that problem made a few billion instead.
These were the same assholes who were arresting people for taking pictures. Hope they all die a slow death.
I hope these policemen can be cured. There are remedies, which the US government has known since 1974 – Marijuana cures cancer:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwOgoTNP7I0&feature=player_embedded
Yes, there is a cure, there is hope:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfUcgF-OhOk&feature=related
It’s time for another heads-up.
I have as much sympathy for the first responders with cancer, as they had for the victims who were left to die in the upper levels of both towers, while New York police and firefighters took “trophy” shots!
http://s43.radikal.ru/i099/1003/6e/95c5b7148faf.jpg
This image was taken by NYPD helo pilot Detective Greg Semendinger, 11 September 2001, there is at least one person right at the corner out of the smoke, whoever it was must have died cursing the NYPD, for not attempting his or her rescue!
http://s014.radikal.ru/i329/1102/51/ee7df9707ac5.gif
My plan is to subpoena all surviving police and firemen, and require them to answer questions in court, re what they saw or heard that deviates from the official line!
Re the missile strike, that took place simultaneously with the air attack on the South Tower for instance, whence they will be hanged as conspirators at the first sign of bs, the NYPD “mechanics” who “tool ppl up,” are the ones I will enjoy hangin’ most!
I compiled a web blog titled:
My Thoughts on 9/11 and False Flag Terrorism
http://www.blissful-wisdom.com/my-thoughts-on-911-and-false-flag-terrorism.html
A section deals with the possibility of a nuclear device being used in the controlled demolition of the two taller towers. Evidence of this goes as follows:
What created the numerous large craters at Ground Zero?
What is the definition of ‘Ground zero’?
“Ground zero” is a technical term dating back to the 1940s describing the point on the earth’s surface at, above, or below the center of a nuclear detonation.”
http://911review.com/coverup/groundzero.html
Discover some pretty amazing photos of the melted rock, and the deep, smoothed holes under building seven. Thousands of degrees of heat were necessary to create these rock formations below the trade towers, heat not available through jet fuel.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_UsC6GvKf0
Could micro-nuclear or some ‘intense-explosive’ devices have created these large craters at the World Trade Center site? What else could explain these gaping holes in so many building foundations?
Watch the images of the smooth rock face, the huge craters, and the photos of the actual tower explosion which are similar to the results of a micro- nuclear explosion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jM3bHgTBxGo&feature=related
What do nuclear bunker buster or micro-nuclear devices look like when they explode?
http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/containment.jpg
19% higher cancer rate among exposed Ground Zero firefighters:
If micro-nuclear devices were used then this would explain the high cancer rates among those firefighters exposed to Gound Zero for the first few weeks after 9/11. If the cancers were only linked to dust and toxins from the demolished towers, we would have expected more lung disease and lung cancers. However, this was not the case. New York Times quote: “there were indications that certain cancers including melanoma, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and thyroid and prostate cancer occurred more frequently among exposed firefighters than in the general population. Occurrences of lung cancer did not increase.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/02/health/research/02cancer.html
Molten Metal And Extremely High Temperatures:
Molten metal found and discussed by ground crew and firemen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNknITygrqc&feature=related
Why demolition site is cleared before the Building Performance Assessment Team can perform inspection?
“FEMA’s so-called investigation had the features of a complete farce:
http://911review.com/coverup/fema_wtc.html
No independent investigation was funded: FEMA allocated $600,000 for the BPAT’s study, which included the cost of printing their report.
Except for an early “tourist trip”, The BPAT volunteers were barred from Ground Zero.
They did not see a single piece of steel until almost a month after the disaster.
They had to guess the original locations of the few pieces of steel they saw.
They collected 150 pieces of steel for further study (out of millions of pieces).
Their report, which called for “further investigation and analysis”, was published after Ground Zero had been scrubbed.
In May of 2002 FEMA’s hand-picked team of volunteers released their report that, although self-described as preliminary and incomplete, would be promoted by government officials as the last word on the causes of the building collapses — at least until the completion of NIST’s Report, more than three years later. FEMA’s World Trade Center Building Performance Study: Data Collection, Preliminary Observations, and Recommendations is full of vague and evasive descriptions of the buildings, deceptive illustrations, and misleading scenarios. Although the report called for more study, by the time it was issued the crime scene had been scrubbed, and the structural steel, which was so essential to any investigation, was long gone. “