Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Confidential Study Reveals Global Finance Is One Big Guesstimate

Saturday, September 22, 2012 3:12
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

NYMag

B4INREMOTE-aHR0cDovLzQuYnAuYmxvZ3Nwb3QuY29tLy1LbFk5cjdHR3J4VS9VRngzTEFEY1BrSS9BQUFBQUFBQUtzVS9iNkRzMEdaSjB0WS9zMTYwMC9hXzE5MHgxOTAuanBn
Sadly it is probably too late for
Diamond’s “but all the other
rate submitters are doing it!” defense.

A few months ago, when the Libor-rigging scandal hit, casual finance-watchers were aghast at the idea that an interest rate that was used to set rates on trillions of dollars of mortgages, car loans, and other financial products was essentially calculated by polling a few banks and expecting them not to lie to everyone. The most important number in global finance run on the honor system? Couldn’t be.

But it was, and Libor was in fact undone by its own trusting nature. As we now know, a coalition of overgrown frat boys conspired to rig the rate, jettisoning the gentleman’s honor of Wall Street past and paving the way for Bob Diamond’s ouster.

Surely, that was it, though, and replacing Libor with a transaction-based rate that took the prices of actual securities into account would solve the problem. There couldn’t be more incredibly important financial numbers out there based on nothing more than a wink and a handshake, right?

Wrong, says Bloomberg, which obtained a confidential memo that revealed that Libor has lots of company when it comes to being easily manipulable:

Fewer than half of the benchmark interest rates surveyed in the U.S., Europe and Asia were based on actual transactions, according to a confidential International Organization of Securities Commissions discussion paper obtained by Bloomberg News. Instead, the rates were calculated by methodologies that were unclear, not transparent and only rarely subject to specific regulatory standards or obligations, the group said.
[...]
According to the discussion paper, about 80 percent of benchmarks were either compiled by associations or private entities. For survey-based benchmarks like Libor, the criteria for submitting data was not always objective and called for judgments about rates and prices, according to the discussion paper. Even in benchmarks that are based on actual transaction data, the compiling bodies retain discretion in producing the actual rates or prices.
Manipulation potential in 80 percent of the world’s benchmark rates? That’s a lot of Bollinger.

  Add to Your Blogger Account   Put it On Facebook   Tweet this post   Print it from your printer   Email and a collection of other outlets   Try even more services

The
Intercept
is a collection and transmission of data that offers
substantive contradictions, challenges and enlightenment over the
conventional drivel brought to us by corporate media.



Source:

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.