Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By Gun Watch (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Politico Writer talks about Obama Regulating FFLs… and does not Know what They Are

Tuesday, January 5, 2016 10:40
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Exclusive!! Want Freedom From Being Censored? Check Out This Last Frontier of Free Press – Tutorial
 

 

Wisconsin Public Radio has the Joy Cardin Show  that invites guests to talk on subjects of the day.  On 5 Januray, 2016, the show was about Obama’s potential executive orders to regulate guns through Federal Firearms License requirements, and others.  The guest that was invited to the show was Timothy Miller, a journalist from Politico.  Miller wrote a piece in Politico about executive orders. 

An activist from Hayward, Wisconsin calls in to the show.  He makes this comment:

 

 

These regulations are not necessary and are just grandstanding by the President.  At one time in the Country, getting a Federal Firearms License, commonly known as an FFL, was an easy process.

A little later he adds:

 

 

In the mid 90′s there were over 220,000 FFLs in the country, just what Obama wants now.  We had a huge number of small time people having FFLs, because it was very convenient to have one. 

For those who do not remember the history, the highest number of FFLs occurred in 1992, during the Clinton administration.   In 1975, just 7 years after the enactment of the Gun Control Act of 1968, the number of FFLs (dealers and pawn brokers) was 149,242.  By 1992 the number had increased to 259,113.  That is when the Clinton administration announced that there were too many FFLs.  It was not alleged that the small FFLs were committing illegal acts.  It was acknowledged that the FFLs were extremely law abiding.  The Clinton administration enacted regulations, later written into the statutes by the Congress, explicitly to *reduce the number* of FFLs.  The changes required an FFL to have a store front, to send in proof that they did not violate local zoning regulations, raised the price of an FFL from $30 to $200 (the original cost was $1) and required fingerprints. 

The onerous regulations and price increase did what they were intended to do; drive hundreds of thousands of small, part time dealers out of business.  By the end of 2009, the number of FFLs had been reduced to an all time low: 54,184.  By 2014, as part of the Obama gun boom, FFLs had rebounded a bit to 63,563.

Timothy Miller then answers the activist with this startling comment.  Remember, the activist had just stated that “a Federal Firearms License, commonly known as an FFL” on the air.   From Miller:

 

 

I don’t know what an FFL is, so I am at a disadvantage here.

Everybody is ignorant about some things.  Maybe it is too much to expect that a Politico journalist would know what an FFL is; after all it is only one of the main items  that the Obama administration is attempting to issue regulations about, and it was just defined, by the caller, a few seconds ago.

The gun culture is used to ignorant journalists who feel compelled to comment on things that they are ignorant about.  It is nothing new.  It helps keep subject matter experts in the field busy writing articles. 

But there is an obvious disconnect between what it appears the Obama administration wants, and what it is obviously trying to get.

If the Obama administration wants people who sell a few guns a year to have those guns go through background checks, then it would make sense to repeal most of the onerous Clinton era regulations on small time gun sellers.  Reduce the fee for an FFL to $1, to encourage people to get them.  Remove the requirements for a storefront and for local compliance with zoning laws designed for storefront stores.   FFL numbers would go back up into the hundreds of thousands and more background checks would be done.

But I do not believe that is what President Obama wants.   What he would prefer is both onerous regulation and a requirement to have an FFL to sell small numbers of firearms.  That way he ensures that people will not easily be able to comply with the law.  The ideal for that situation to require a $10,000 fee for an FFL, and require anyone who sold more than one gun a year to have an FFL.  Then there would be zero small time legal dealers.

I agree with the caller.  This is political grandstanding.  I recommend that President Obama keep it up, pile on more and more.  The far left statists love it, and there is nothing that motivates people to go to the polls in November more than a renewed push for gun control.

Exclusive!! Want Freedom From Being Censored? Check Out This Last Frontier of Free Press – Tutorial

©2016 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.
Link to Gun Watch
 

 



Source: http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2016/01/politico-writer-talks-about-obama.html

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.