Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By SkyTruth (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

At Last: FracFocus Now Publishing Machine-Readable Data

Friday, May 8, 2015 12:33
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)


B4INREMOTE-aHR0cDovLzQuYnAuYmxvZ3Nwb3QuY29tLy1aV0xULUlPWGhGUS9WVTBPbzlmaXlaSS9BQUFBQUFBQUJ1ay9SMzZEMTJ5N1BQRS9zNjQwL2pvbmFoZmllbGQtZWNvZmxpZ2h0LmpwZw==
Gas drilling and fracking in the Jonah Field on public lands in western Wyoming. Photo courtesy Bruce Gordon / EcoFlight.


 If you’ve been a faithful reader of this blog, you’ve seen a relentless series of blog posts from us criticizing the functional failures of FracFocus as a tool for the effective public disclosure of chemicals used for fracking at oil and gas drilling sites nationwide.  Well, today we got some good news: FracFocus has finally stepped up to fix one of those problems, and is now making the chemical data available in a aggregated, machine-readable database.  Data geeks, have at it, and let us know what you learn!  But note the caveats from FracFocus:

Disclosures submitted using the FracFocus 1.0 format (January, 2011 to May 31, 2013) will contain only header data. Disclosures submitted using the FracFocus 2.0 format (November 2012 to present) will contain both header and chemical data. NOTE: Between November, 2012 and May 31, 2013 disclosures in both 1.0 and 2.0 formats were submitted to the system. After May 31, 2013 only disclosures submitted in the 2.0 format were accepted.

The database contains information exactly as reported to FracFocus, and only the data displayed on the disclosure PDF files. FracFocus does not alter or modify the submitted data in any way.

Why did SkyTruth first raise this issue to the attention of the public and other NGOs in June 2012? Why did we work to make it a high-profile element of the national debate about fracking through  testimony to Congress, comments on federal rulemaking, and direct communication with high-level policymakers? Because without specific, complete and trustworthy data identifying the chemicals, and the exact time and place those chemicals are injected into wells for hydraulic fracturing, you can’t do the science to investigate and conclusively prove (or disprove) that air or water contamination, or public health problems, are being caused by modern drilling with high-volume hydraulic fracturing.  And, in our opinion, without good science, you can’t make good policy.

So this is a very positive change, but it’s only a first step.  Now we hope FracFocus will quickly address the other major problems that continue to hamper public use of the data and violate the intent of state and federal laws requiring public disclosure: the poor quality of the data; the lack of any effective curation of the data and the disclosure reports; and — worst of all — the indiscriminate, unjustified use of “trade-secret exemption” that allows the oil and gas industry to arbitrarily hide the identities of fracking chemicals from an increasingly concerned public.  

It shouldn’t take another 3 years to fix those problems. Let’s get it done.



Source: http://blog.skytruth.org/2015/05/at-last-fracfocus-now-publishing.html

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.