| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Can Obama Say With 100% Certainty?
Wednesday, September 4, 2013 10:40
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
From: Billy
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 9:47 AM
To: John Rolls
Subject: Can Obama Say With 100% Certainty?
To: John Rolls
Subject: Can Obama Say With 100% Certainty?
To the Editor :
Can an attack on Syria only on Obama`s command ensure Israel will not then be attacked by Syria? Can Obama say with 100% certainty that Russia, China or Iran won`t intervene on Syria`s behalf escalating this conflict futher towards world war?
If Obama has the proof it was Syria who used chemical weapons instead of the Islamic radical rebels then he needs to present this evidence to the American people. Saying this information is classified does not cut it with so many of America`s sons & daughters lives at risk. His word is not good enough when the consequences to America & the world are so great from a U.S. attack on Syria.
The fate of the world is greater than Obama saving face at home & internationally with an attack on Syria two years too late. If our constitution means nothing then scrap it & crown Obama king for life as many liberals want. I`m sure this will bode well for America`s future considering Obama`s past track record of failures besides Syria.
Billy
You who can figure out nothing, let me, nonetheless, try a painfully obvious analogy. Nancy Pelosi is for this intervention in Syria, suddenly a war hawk. Is there one person out there who can honestly say Nancy Pelosi would have been for an attack on Syria, had George Bush proposed it? Let’s strain to take the analogy a little further: is what Obama has been up to with Libya, the CIA, Egypt and now Syria any different than the neocon agenda?
It’s all sock puppets for the military industrial complex and the oil companies, the game looting the treasury of the U.S. Your children’s blood is part of what the chicken hawks spend, to profit themselves. Just go back to sleep if you think any of this is about morality, what, blowing people to bits versus gassing them?
Incidentally, anybody stupid and immoral enough to bring you the likes of the last 10 years U.S. history, for the enrichment and power of a few, is stupid and immoral enough to get you into WW3: these people will crap where they sleep and eat the goose that lays the golden eggs, make no mistake: they are just that blind, just that empty in their souls and depraved.
Romans 3
10 As it is written: “There is none righteous, no, not one;
11 There is none who understands; There is none who seeks after God.
12 They have all turned aside; They have together become unprofitable; There is none who does good, no, not one.”
13 “Their throat is an open tomb; With their tongues they have practiced deceit”; ” The poison of asps is under their lips”;
14 “Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness.”
15 “Their feet are swift to shed blood;
16 Destruction and misery are in their ways;
17 And the way of peace they have not known.”
18 “There is no fear of God before their eyes.”
Does not matter who used chemical weapons in Syria, America uses them on a daily basis in Afghanistan Iraq Yemen etc etc. Syria has not attacked any of it’s neighbors Syria did NOT ratify the CW protocols. The use of these weapons by a government against it’s own population is not an International crime. The US Homeland security has purchased billions of hollow point rounds of ammunition that is a war crime to use outside US boarders. The US used banned chemical weapons to kill 79 men women and children in Wako Texas , Monsanto and US big Pharma sells chemical weapons as food and medicine all round the world. So lets get real all you Yanks can go stuff your heads up your ass and whistle Dixie.