Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By Independent Media Review Analysis (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Weekly Commentary: Trump-Netanyahu Meeting: Time for Real Program – 2

Wednesday, February 8, 2017 15:22
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Weekly Commentary: Trump-Netanyahu Meeting: Time for Real Program – 2
Sovereign States NOT Solution!
Dr. Aaron Lerner 8 February 2017

For two sovereign state solution advocates its pretty much a foundation of
their faith – that somewhere out there is an ironclad, rock solid,
watertight security arrangement just waiting to be finalized.

But I have checked with top Israeli International law experts. Including
former senior diplomats who themselves base the programs they pitch on the
hypothesis that such a security arrangement exists.

They all concede that a sovereign Palestinian state would CONTINUE to be a
sovereign state even if it openly declared that it was cancelling whatever
security arrangements it agreed to in order to come into existence.

The independence of Palestinian sovereignty from compliance is not some
obscure irrelevant fact.

It undermines the very foundation of the two sovereign state solution
program.

And with a new president in the White House who has yet to embrace the “two
sovereign state solution” faith, its time to talk about what can and should
be done given that two sovereign states is anything but a solution.

Maximum equality = maximum annexation

Full Israeli citizenship for every resident within annexed areas for full
and equal rights.

As for areas not annexed: maximum autonomy combined with maximum access to
Israel. With the exception of individuals identified as security risks
everyone in the autonomy can visit Israel, engage in commerce (as both
employees and entrepreneurs) in Israel and reach the rest of the world via
Israel’s airports and seaports. Containers bound for the autonomy can travel
“in bond” by rail from Ashdod or Haifa port to a Palestinian autonomy
terminal – much as containers bound for Toronto may move “in bond” through
New York.

To be clear: there is a lot that needs to be worked out.

There is most definitely a place for think tanks, diplomats, politicians and
others to contribute to hammering out the details.

Details of a program that doesn’t rely on the false premise that somewhere
out there is an ironclad, rock solid, watertight security arrangement for a
sovereign Palestinian state just waiting to be finalized.
________________________________________
IMRA – Independent Media Review and Analysis

Since 1992 providing news and analysis on the Middle East with a focus on
Arab-Israeli relations

Website: www.imra.org.il



Source: http://www.imra.org.il/story.php3?id=72143

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.