Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By Voice of Reason
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Mainstream Media Admits: Gun “Control” Equals Gun “Confiscation”

Friday, November 6, 2015 12:47
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Confiscation

WARNING: GUN OWNERS MIGHT WANT TO START PREPARING FOR AN UGLY BATTLE… 

HOPEFULLY ONLY FIGURATIVELY, NOT LITERALLY!

It sure would help if people would start to wise up, and leave rhetoric such as, “I’d like to see the government try…” or “From my cold dead fingers…” etc., at home. If this does bubble up to government coming for guns, and a recent ruling by the  U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit just paved the way for it, then people are going to die. Americans are going to die. Some of YOUR loved ones may DIE, so rather than run mouths with platitudes that belong on bumper stickers, people MIGHT want to try to get educated for a change. A copy of the Constitution with the Second Amendment on it won’t protect you if federal agents swarm your home, and if you have a family, it won’t protect them either. People should wise up to that fact, and wise up to it quick. 

In the following video, Gary Franchi reports on recent developments on the gun confiscation issue. In the video, Franchi makes reference to another recent article written by Alex Thomas of Intellihub which was covered in, New Court Ruling Paves Way For Mass Gun Confiscation In America. What video below covers, and the Mainstream Media is deliberately not reporting, is that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in a much-anticipated decision, has upheld the constitutionality of the New York SAFE Act of 2013, an act considered to include some of the most drastic gun control laws in the history of the United States. The New York SAFE Act of 2013 could go down as Obama’s biggest signature achievement, as it was passed in response to the Sandy Hook Hoax. If The New York SAFE Act of 2013 gets upheld by the same Supreme Court that you may recall upheld both Obamacare and a national right to gay marriage, both by way of unconstitutional judicial fiat, then NOTHING prevents Congress from passing federal legislation that does the same thing as the New York SAFE Act. In a new article, written by James Kirchick in the Daily Beast, the article begins with a title that confirms that yes, government DOES want to TAKE AWAY our guns but are too cowardly to actually publicly speak about it.

Court Opens Door To Gun Confiscation

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

CHECK OUT THE NEW GOOGLE+ PAGE!

 

WHAT DOES ALL THAT MEAN IN ENGLISH?

It means like that New York SAFE allows for in New York, except on a federal level, MILLIONS OF FIREARMS WOULD BE OUTLAWED OVERNIGHT. Then, the Feds would have the right to confiscate and destroy any of said firearms without compensating the owner, just like they do illegal drugs. Should the New York SAFE Act of 2013 be upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, and at this point it’s pretty clear the Court cares little for what is “Constitutional,” then the rubber will finally meet the road. The only thing standing between confiscation by the government, is the very guns themselves and their owners, which means bloodshed. Before you’re quick to chime in with a meaningless platitude, ask if a war for guns is worth having your child dead in your arms over. War is an ugly thing, and too many Americans are quick to shoot their mouths off (no pun intended), without thinking the whole thing through. Clearly this is a red hot issue with passion on both sides, and the record, my stance over the course of 4,500 blog posts has always been PRO SECOND AMENDMENT, so don’t bother shooting the messenger, but do yourself and the country a favor, and get educated on what is happening right now without your knowledge.

ASK YOURSELF HOW MANY IDEOLOGICAL AGENDA ITEMS OBAMA HAS CAVED ON THUS FAR… THEN YOU MAY WANT TO CHECK OUT THE FOLLOWING:

New Court Ruling Paves Way For Mass Gun Confiscation In America

2nd Amendment in the Hands of the U.N. – Obama Does Believe in Guns

Veterans: Obama is Coming For Your Guns, and he Will Get Them!

How Will You Respond When They Come For YOUR Guns? Better Think it Through!

If They Come For Your Guns, Do You Have A Responsibility To Fight?

Michelle Obama Promises To Confiscate All Firearms Before Leaving the White House

 

Guns 3

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM

 

 

Alex Thomas at Intellihub writes:

In the last month numerous liberal news outlets and mainstream media commentators have either directly admitted that they want mass gun confiscation in America or implied it by promoting Australia’s response to a mass shooting in the 1990’s.

In true Orwellian doublespeak, these same news outlets also routinely ridicule the pro gun side for even insinuating that liberals consider confiscation a legitimate option.

Related: CNN and liberal professor push for outright gun ban and mass confiscation “once and for all”

Now, in what appears to be out of simple frustration, a mainstream media reporter has penned an op-ed in which he openly admits that liberal gun control advocates absolutely do favor mass confiscation by government force but are simply too afraid to totally admit this fact. (Although as I have shown, numerous gun grabbers have selectively let the cat out of the bag)

The article, written by James Kirchick in the Daily Beast, starts off with a title that confirms that yes, they do want to take away our guns but are too cowardly to actually publicly speak about it.

“Why don’t gun-control advocates like Hillary Clinton talk about the one gun control solution that could actually fix the firearms problem in America,” Kirchick asks in the articles byline.

The article itself is essentially about detailing what the author believes are beliefs on both sides of the debate that those that hold them are unwilling to admit publicly. For gun control advocates that is mass confiscation under the threat of violence and for the pro gun side that is the belief that although it is a tragedy each and every time, some citizens naturally are going to die in order for Americans to keep their 2nd Amendment rights.

For the gun-control side, the unspoken belief is that nothing short of all out confiscation will have an appreciable effect on decreasing gun deaths. Then again, it’s not that unspoken—gun-control advocates just prefer tergiversation to clarity.

Democratic candidates, officeholders, and liberal websites frequently invoke the example of Australia, for example. After a 1996 shooting rampage killed 35 people, the Australian government outlawed an array of firearms and instituted a compulsory buyback program that effectively eliminated private gun ownership. Since then, gun violence has dropped precipitously.

Rarely in American gun-control advocates’ references to the Australian policy, however, do they acknowledge that the program amounted to confiscation. “

When Australia had a mass killing—I think it was in Tasmania—about 25 years ago, it was just so shocking, the entire country said, ‘Well, we’re going to completely change our gun laws,’ and they did,” Obama said after a June shooting in a Charleston church killed nine people. Curiously, the president omitted just what “change” the people of Australia decided to implement.

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton told an audience in New Hampshire last month that “Australia is a good example” of gun-control laws, so much so that it “would be worth considering” the Antipodean solution here in the United States. She, too, neglected to mention the obligatory nature of the gun buyback scheme.

Kirchick is basically reporting what I and many others have reported ad nauseam over the past few months and that is the fact that liberals openly want confiscation and that this is proven whenever they bring up Australia.

The difference is that Kirchick is writing for a mainstream news outlet with a history of liberal bias, a source that Americans unfamiliar with the alternative media would immediately consider credible. What we have here is basically the full on admission by the mainstream press that mass confiscation is the plan held by the anti gun left.

Kirchick goes on to highlight the laughable nonsense that is Hillary Clinton and her allies promoting confiscation on one hand while attacking anyone that brings up the fear of confiscation on the other.

The following week, after having explicitly praised gun confiscation, however, she mocked the National Rifle Association for supposedly scaring its members into thinking that “they’re the only thing that’s going to stop the black helicopters from landing in the front yard and people’s guns being seized.”

Holding up Australia as a model of sensible gun policy without mentioning how that government forced its citizens to turn over their weapons is like praising Chinese population-control efforts without mentioning the one-child policy.

These advocates of gun control note the efficacy of the confiscations they only hint at while sidestepping the fact that none of the restrictive measures they explicitly endorse—banning so-called assault weapons, limiting the size of magazines, or requiring background checks on the private transfer of firearms—would have prevented these mass shootings, committed as they were by individuals using legally obtained firearms that did not fall under the definition of “assault weapon.”

While Kirchick claims that actual confiscation, although favored by gun control advocates, is impossible in the United States, recent signs indicate that, at the very least, these anti gun zealots are going to try, even if that means risking a new civil war.

As I reported less than two weeks ago, a recent court ruling has literally given gun control advocates the legal framework to pass mass confiscation legislation on a federal level.

“In a ruling that directly paves the way for mass confiscation of firearms in America, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in a much-anticipated decision, has upheld the constitutionality of the New York SAFE Act of 2013.

Shockingly, the court ruled that nearly all of the most drastic gun control law in the history of the United States did not violate the Second Amendment and is therefore constitutional.”

Add this to the fact that liberal news outlets are now calling for all gun owners to be shot and you have a plethora of direct evidence that the anti-gun faction in this country is ready to take their mission to the next level.

What do you think?

Why is the mainstream media now expressly admitting that gun control advocates want mass gun confiscation under the threat of government violence?

Read the artilc at Intellihub here:

 

Guns

FOR MORE ON BARACK COMING FOR OUR GUNS!

Obama Arms ISIS, Pushes Gun Control on Very Same Day

Patriots Guard Home of Veteran to Stop VA From Confiscating His Guns

Never Letting a Crisis Go To Waste; The Gun Gestapo Recruits Hillary

Obama to Limit Free Speech About Guns Now

2nd Amendment in the Hands of the U.N. – Obama Does Believe in Guns

Veterans: Obama is Coming For Your Guns, and he Will Get Them!

Congress Won’t Pass Gun Legislation: Obama Will Start BANNING Bullets

How Will You Respond When They Come For YOUR Guns? Better Think it Through!

If They Come For Your Guns, Do You Have A Responsibility To Fight?

Michelle Obama Promises To Confiscate All Firearms Before Leaving the White House

U.S. Military Told to Prepare to Fight Fellow Americans

Homeland Security Drones Looking For Civilians Carrying Guns

MUST GO VIRAL! – PLEASE SHARE WITH EVERY PERSON YOU KNOW!!!!!

ARMY TOLD TO USE LETHAL FORCE AGAINST “UNARMED U.S. CIVILIANS”

MUST READ!!! – If You Won’t Fight, You’d Better Start Running!

The “New Army Manual” – Does It Destroy the 1st Amendment?

The Government is Seriously Cracking Down on Preppers

State Deputy on Tape Saying MRAP Vehicles To Fight Legal Gun Owners

The Government is AFRAID of VETERANS & They Should Be!

SEAL Veteran: Military Leaders Being Asked if They Will Disarm Americans

10 Things That Would Start an Armed Revolt in America

What Would a Second American Revolution Look Like?

4 Star General Warns Marines About New Battleground - The Homeland

Bone Chilling Interview With DHS Security Official – Obama Will NOT Rest

We are Preparing for Massive Civil War, Says DHS Informant

Leaked DOJ Memo: Government Plans To Outlaw and Confiscate All Guns…

Leaked Video: FEMA Preparing Military Police For Gun Confiscation

 

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

CHECK OUT THE NEW GOOGLE+ PAGE!

BE SURE TO GO MY PROFILE’S BELOW AT OTHER SOCIAL MEDIA:

FACEBOOK | TWITTER | PINTEREST | STUMBLE UPON | TUMBLER

 

THE VOICE OF REASON

 

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.