Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By Dickinson Mackaman Tyler & Hagen PC
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

In absence of statutory exception, defendant must be sued in county of residence

Wednesday, May 18, 2016 8:51
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Schmitt and Abernethy entered into a contract. The contract did not state where performance was to occur, but payment was to be made to Abernethy in Johnson County.  When Schmitt breached, Abernethy sued in Johnson County. Schmitt moved to transfer venue to Woodbury County, his county of residence.

In Abernethy v. Schmitt, No. 15-0661 (May 11, 2016), the Iowa Court of Appeals agreed with Schmitt. A contract to pay at a particular place does not amount to a requirement that performance was to occur at that place. Thus, the venue was not dictated by the place of the contract’s performance—the place of performance was not stated.

Rather, the Court of Appeals applied Iowa Code section 616.17, “Personal actions, except as otherwise provided, must be brought in a county in which some of the defendants actually reside.” Breach of contract suits, as personal actions, are governed by Section 616.17. As Schmitt resided in Woodbury County, his motion to change venue should have been granted.

Moreover, pursuant to Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 1.808(1), “the [district] court shall order the change of venue at plaintiff’s costs, which may include reasonable compensation for defendant’s trouble and expense, including attorney’s fees, in attending in the wrong county.”  Thus, the court in Schmitt should have considered granting Schmitt’s request for attorney’s fees, including time spent on the appeal.

The lesson to contracting parties that wish to litigate in a certain venue is to have the contract specifically state where performance is to occur. Alternatively, contracting parties should be ready to pursue collections suits in the county where the defendant resides.

For questions regarding Abernethy v. Schmitt, No. 15-0661 (May 11, 2016) or commercial litigation, contact Mollie Pawlosky.

The material in this blog is not intended, nor should it be construed or relied upon, as legal advice. Please consult with an attorney if specific legal information is needed.



Source: http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2016/05/absence-statutory-exception-defendant-sued-county-residence/

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.