Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By TheLightinthedarkplace
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Two Accounts of Creation? Genesis Mystery Solved!

Saturday, April 1, 2017 7:27
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

1. First Account: Genesis 1(KJV Holy Bible)

Genesis 1: 26  And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

27  So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

in our image – Biblical definition

From an unused root meaning to shade; a phantom, that is, (figuratively) illusion, resemblance; hence a representative figure, especially an idol: - image, vain shew. 
(from The Strongs Concordance. Hebrew word H6754  צֶלֶם  tselem  tseh’-lem)

THIS IS MAN IS AN IDOL


2. Second Account: Genesis 2(KJV Holy Bible)

Genesis 2: 7  And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

a living – Biblical definition

From H2421; alive; hence raw (flesh); fresh (plant, water, year), strong; also (as noun, especially in the feminine singular and masculine plural) life (or living thing), whether literally or figuratively: –    + age, alive, appetite, (wild) beast, company, congregation, life (-time), live (-ly), living (creature, thing), maintenance, + merry, multitude, + (be) old, quick, raw, running, springing, troop.
(from The Strongs Concordance. Hebrew word 
H2416  חַי  chay  khah’ee)

THIS IS MAN IS A LIVING SOUL


Not only is one man an idol and the other man a living soul, there is also a major difference between “God” and the “LORD God”  - You need to see this!  

FEATURED VIDEO:

There is a battle between these two accounts of man that were created:

For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would.” (Galatians 5:17  KJV Holy Bible)

The battleground is your body (temple). The battle is in your heart, mind and for your soul:

“For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit.

For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.

Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.

But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.” (Romans 8: 5-9  KJV Holy Bible)


For the COMPLETE bombshell disclosure and study on the two accounts of creation – This is the full length SPECIAL VIDEO:

The hybridization of the flesh and spirit originated in The Garden of Eden: The Fall of Man. Since then, every person born on Earth is a walking battleground, divided amongst themselves between good and evil. When a child is born on Earth, an angel is cast down from heaven into the flesh:

“I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High. But ye shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes.” (Psalm 82:6-7 KJV Holy Bible)

You were exiled from heaven. This is the biggest news ever! The mystery of the human race is solved.

 

For more wild revelations and hidden truths brought to light, we welcome you to visit:


Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 12 comments
  • There is no lord god in original scripture only Je$uit translations that replaced all the true Hebrew names.
    Bereshith/Genesis 1:26-27
    26 And Elohim said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the heavens, and over the livestock, and over all the earth and over all the creeping creatures that creep on the ground”
    27 And Elohim created man in His image, in the image of Elohim He created him – male and female He created them.
    Bereshith/Genisis 2:7
    And YHWH Elohim formed man out of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils breath of lives. And man became a living being.
    GalatiYAns 5:16-17
    16 But I say, walk by His RUWach and you will not fulfill the lust of the flesh.
    17 For the flesh fights against His RUWach and His RUWach against the flesh and these are contrary to one another, that you may not do the things that your flesh alone desires.
    RomaniYA 8:5-9
    5 For those who live according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh, but those who live according to His RUWach YAHUWAH, set their minds on the things of His RUWach.(Spirit of YAHUWAH)
    6 For the mind of the flesh is death, but the mind of RUWach YAHUWAH is life and peace,
    7 because the mind of the flesh is hostile towards Almighty Loving YA of All Creation for it is not subject to Almighty Loving YA of All Creations’s law, neither indeed can it be.
    8 Those who are in the flesh cannot please EL YAH of All Creation.
    9 But you are not in the flesh but in His RUWach, if it is so that His RUWach of Almighty Loving YA of All Creation dwells in you.Yet if any man does not have YAHUWAH’s RUWach, the Eternal King of The Family in YAH, Nevis not His.

  • Here we go with the Documentary Hypothesis nonsense.

    Sure there’s differences between the Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 accounts but they are reconcilable once perspective is taken into account at which point all supposed contradictions vanish into thin air.

    Genesis 1 speaks to the chronological grand plan.

    Genesis 2 topically addresses man and environment.

    This method of narration (“technique of recapitulation” – Gleason Archer – A Survey of Old Testament Introduction – page 118) is also found in the New Testament writings, for example, Mark’s account of the ministry of Christ is more chronological while Matthew’s is more topical. Further more in his book Archer references other examples, of this literary technique, found in extraneous Semitic writings.

    For the argument, that there are divergent creation accounts, to hold up one must accept that Jesus was wrong to combine quotes from Gen 1 & Gen 2, in a single sentence, when He said in Matthew 19:4-5…

    “He who made them from the beginning made them male and female (Gen 1:27), and said, For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife; and the two shall become one flesh (Gen 2:24).”

    … which begs the question is it more likely that Jesus was wrong or the documentary hypothesis is wrong?

    • Here we go with the Documentary Hypothesis nonsense.

      Sure there’s differences between the Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 accounts but they are reconcilable once perspective is taken into account at which point all supposed contradictions vanish into thin air.

      Genesis 1 speaks to the chronological grand plan.

      Genesis 2 topically addresses man and environment.

      This method of narration (“technique of recapitulation” – Gleason Archer – A Survey of Old Testament Introduction – page 118) is also found in the New Testament writings, for example, Mark’s account of the ministry of Christ is more chronological while Matthew’s is more topical. Further more in his book Archer references other examples, of this literary technique, found in extraneous Semitic writings.

      For the argument, that there are divergent creation accounts, to hold up one must accept that Jesus was wrong to combine quotes from Gen 1 & Gen 2, in a single sentence, when He said in Matthew 19:4-5…

      “He who made them from the beginning made them male and female (Gen 1:27), and said, For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife; and the two shall become one flesh (Gen 2:24).”

      … which begs the question is it more likely that Jesus was wrong or the documentary hypothesis is wrong?

  • Mayhem asked:

    “…is it more likely that Jesus was wrong or the documentary hypothesis is wrong?”

    I think it might be a bit more like Jesus is lying to us. I mean, He would have to be, if Mr. Kleck’s theory holds any water at all. Pre-Adamic man? Really?

    Thus sayeth Jesus:

    The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field.

    Job finished. Next:

    But while everyone was sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat, and went away.

    Hmmmm… Seems to be a reversal of order here.

    When the wheat sprouted and formed heads, then the weeds also appeared.

    Now, Lightinthedarkplace…

    You can do as you like — you can follow Johnathan Kleck and his many fantastic assertions about the order of things and the nature of things, or you can believe what is written in the Word of God.

    You cannot do both.

    Kleck has it that we’re all fallen angels?

    Scripture tells us precisely what we are — and it isn’t that.

    GOD WORKS FIRST. Always. Then the enemy (Darkness) comes along and sows confusion, distortion and abomination. There are no exceptions to this maxim anywhere from Genesis through Revelation.

    (You might also consider how many times God is referred to in Old Testament Scripture as YHWH ELOHIM. You might also consider His words to us in the Ten Commandments. You might also consider not relying so heavily upon the teaching of a single man — ANY single man in this world; living or dead.)

    • Of course, Cintus, if you ask your favourite search engine that very question, “light precedes darkness”, you’ll get swamped with Gurus, Joos, Sacred Texts, Twitterati and Books that all have it the other way round.

      No surprises there, huh?

      • But, but…

        …there was EVENING and there was MORNING, the First Day!!!

        There it is right there. Right? Darkness comes FIRST!!!

        (Except, no. It doesn’t. Not unless you just completely ignore the DAY that came before the evening, that is. This whole rectilinear time thing can be so confusing. If we listen to the words of men over the Word of God, that is.)

        • OKAY, smart alec (the objection goes)…

          In Genesis 1 Darkness comes before LIGHT!!!

          In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. The earth was without form and void, and DARKNESS!!! was over the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters. And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light.

          Uh oh. But wait, there’s more…

          1 Timothy 6:16

          …who alone has immortality, who dwells in unapproachable light, whom no one has ever seen or can see. To HIM be honor and eternal dominion. Amen.

          Who is the HIM Paul writes about here? That same GOD which was there, In The Beginning, creating the Heavens and the Earth.

          Before there was Darkness, there was LIGHT.

          Always.

          • Absolutely and yet i’m not at all surprised that the god of this world has that truth buried several pages into the search engine results other than it being found deep within a single page 2 web site.

  • Thank you for sharing the truth. For those with eyes to see and ears to hear.

    • Begone ye, turd touching plebber. Begone from this place and returneth not. (It’s weird to praise your own articles under a different screen name. Just take a look at Corey DeFrancesco and you’ll see what I mean. If my insult has reached you in error I don’t care, whatsoever.)

      • “If my insult has reached you in error I don’t care, whatsoever.”

        The Clucker has spoken.

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.