Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By Voice of Reason
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

FIRING ON PATRIOTS, CAPITALISTS, & VETERANS: 160 Page D.H.S. Document Gives Details!

Friday, April 24, 2015 21:03
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

LET’S SEE IF WATCHING THIS VIDEO GETS YOUR ATTENTION…

GET THIS POST TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW!

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

By: Voice of Reason

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

 

IF THAT VIDEO CONCERNS YOU: READ THIS WHOLE POST!

I hope to God I have your attention. Nothing that follows is going to be any easier to digest. The biggest difference in what follows is that it won’t be packaged up into a three minute video. People HAVE to learn what is happening under the CRIMINAL ADMINISTRATION before all hell breaks lose, and I assure you it will. HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS have been spent for just such a reason… so you can be sure trouble is coming. 

My God, I wish Americans would WAKE UP! The FORMER HEAD OF THE PENTAGON CALLED OBAMA’S PURGING OF THE MILITARY “TERRIFYING,” the only reason I can figure that statement doesn’t get more attention is because perhaps some people have short memories and have forgotten what that word means or something… so let me help with defining what TERRIFYING means:

“To cause to feel extreme fear.” 

Example: “The thought terrifies me”

Synonyms: petrify, horrify, frighten, scare, scare stiff, scare/frighten to death, scare, to frighten the living daylights out of, scare/frighten the life out of, scare/frighten someone out of their wits, scare witless, strike terror into, put the fear of God into…

Now, when the FORMER HEAD OF THE PENTAGON CALLS OBAMA’S PURGING OF THE MILITARY, “TERRIFYING…”

IT’S A BIG FREAKING DEAL! GET IT?

OBAMA HAS EVERY REASON TO FEAR VETERANS…

We’re not talking about some “Right-Wing Tea-Bagger” as our friends on the left would say… that was the HEAD OF THE PENTAGON! Guess what? He’s not alone. THE FORMER HEAD OF THE F.B.I. TESTIFIED THAT AMERICANS “SHOULD BE DEEPLY SKEPTICAL OF THE GOVERNMENT.” Guess what? He’s not alone either! A FEDERAL JUDGE HAS ACCUSED OBAMA OF USING THE D.H.S. AS HIS OWN PERSONAL ARMY too!!!

ANYONE ELSE IN HISTORY WITH SIMILARITIES DO THAT?

Symbols

FOR ANYONE NOT SEEING THE OBAMA/HITLER CONNECTION…

LET ME HELP!!!!

 

I KNOW WHAT YOU’RE THINKING…

HOW COULD I BELIEVE OUR MILITARY WOULD FIRE ON US CITIZENS RIGHT? 

TO BEGIN: THEY ARE TRAINING FOR IT IN TEN STATES RIGHT NOW!!!!!!

Furthermore, the following is from a post I wrote about by DAVE HODGES OF THE COMMON SENSE SHOW:

This article covers it all! False Flags, Martial Law, and Civil Unrest all as a Result of a SEVERE Economic Collapse, followed by FEMA CAMPS, and our very own men and women in uniform being called on by the Communist in Chief to fire on American civilians. Much to my dismay, the scientific and historical evidence is HEAVILY in favor of the troops obeying orders. Furthermore, the U.S. ARMY MANUAL IS ALSO IN FAVOR OF FIRING ON INNOCENT CIVILIANS FOR INFRACTIONS AS MINOR AS PROTESTING GOVERNMENT!

I hate to admit it, but history aside, I’ve thought from the beginning that if given the order to fire on American Civilians is given, whoever is still in the military at that point would obey it. I don’t have ONE cross word to say about the military, and I support them every chance I can. Since 9/11, almost without fail, every time I see a servicemen or woman in uniform I’ll even cross the street for no other reason than just to extend my hand and say, “Thank you for your service.” With that said, we know OBAMA HAS GUTTED THE MILITARY AND FIRED OVER 300 OF THE HIGHEST RANKING OFFICERS.

IN MY SECOND MONTH BLOGGING I WROTE THE FOLLOWING: 

Well renowned author and humanitarian Dr. Jim Garrow made a shocking claim about what we can expect to see in Obama’s second term. Garrow made the following Facebook post:

I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new “litmus test” in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. “The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not.” Those who will not are being removed.

So, who is the source? Garrow replied: “The man who told me this is one of America’s foremost military heroes.” Understand, this is NOT coming from Alex Jones or Jesse Ventura, or from anyone else the left often dismisses with great ease. Garrow is a well-respected activist and has spent much of his life rescuing infant girls from China, babies who would be killed under that country’s one-child policy. He was also nominated for Nobel Peace Prize for his work. His bio on Amazon.com reads:

Dr. James Garrow is the author of The Pink Pagoda: One Man’s Quest to End Gendercide in China. He has spent over $25 million over the past sixteen years rescuing an estimated 40,000 baby Chinese girls from near-certain death under China’s one-child-per-couple policy by facilitating international adoptions. He is the founder and executive director of the Bethune Institute’s Pink Pagoda schools, private English-immersion schools for Chinese children. Today he runs 168 schools with nearly 6,300 employees.

This comes on the heels of Sunday’s report in the Washington Free Beacon (WFB) that the head of Central Command, MARINE CORPS GENERAL JAMES MATTIS is being dismissed by Obama and will leave his post in March. The WFB article states:

“Word on the national security street is that General James Mattis is being given the bum’s rush out of his job as commander of Central Command, and is being told to vacate his office several months earlier than planned.”

Did Gen. Mattis refuse to “fire on U.S. citizens?” Read this article at the Examiner.com Related articles: Is martial law imminent?

Mattis

I can’t seem to find the post, but there was another article that stated another litmus test used by Obama was whether or not the high ranking official was personally loyal to Obama or their oath. If the person was OVERLY PATRIOTIC, or a CONSTITUTION LOVER of some kind, they were dismissed from service. Personal loyalty to Obama was a requirement. Remember, most of these active members are young kids too, so I don’t fault them… I’m just reporting my experience and my belief that most soldiers would follow orders when it came down to it. Between following orders or “OFF TO THE BRIG,” combined with peer pressure, groupthink, and so on, I think it would be tough NOT to follow orders. 

 

BESIDES, HISTORY TELLS US THEY SHOOT!!!!!!!!

Army-Response-Hurricane-Katrina-600x374

We live in chaotic times. Many feel that our fragile economy could come crashing down at any timeOne devastating terrorist attackfalse flag attack or natural disaster could lead to an unprecedented situation and MARTIAL LAW would be declared. Some Americans would take to the streets and the only remaining question is whether or not American soldiers, called to the scene, would restore order by firing upon American citizens when ordered to do so?

This scenario and the resulting public execution of American citizens for engaging in protesting has happened many times in our past. For those old enough to remember, the 1970 Kent State massacre should come to mind as the Ohio National Guard opened fire on protesting college students on the campus of Kent State University. But for those who believe that this was merely an anomaly, let’s examine what the field of psychology has discovered about the answer to this question.

The Oath Keepers Cannot Save Protesters

Some our citizens are deluded into a false sense of security by the group known as Oath Keepers. It is a well-intentioned effort to remind both law enforcement and the military to uphold the Constitution and to disobey unlawful orders which would bring harm to American citizens. Under this false sense of security, many in the American public really believe that American troops will not fire upon American citizens. Unfortunately, the field of psychology demonstrates why only a minority of soldiers will actually resist committing atrocities against the American people.

Conformity to Group Norms: The Solomon Asch Experiment

Do you think of yourself as a conformist or a non-conformist? If you ask most people the same question, you would find that most people consider themselves to be a non-conformist and would be able to stand up to a group when they know they are right. However, can nonconformists actually resist the peer pressure to blend in with the rest of their peers?

In the 1950’s, Polish born psychologist, Solomon Asch, conducted a conformity study. The participants signed up to participate in a psychology experiment in which they were asked to complete a vision test. This was a deception. The real experiment attempted to answer the question, can people resist peer pressure to conform to a false belief?

Seated in a room with the other participants, the research participants are shown a line segment and then asked to choose the matching line from a group three segments of different lengths.

Asch_experiment

 

The experimenter subsequently asked each participant individually to select the matching line segment. On some occasions everyone in the group chooses the correct line, but occasionally, the other participants unanimously declare that a different line is actually the correct match. Unknown to the main subject of the experiment, everyone else in the experiment is a confederate and their answers have been preplanned for the purpose of determining whether, or not, the participant’s answer can be determined by the people deliberately giving the wrong answer.

Nearly 75 percent of the participants in the conformity experiments went along with the rest of the group at least one time. After combining the trials, the results indicated that participants conformed to the incorrect group answer approximately one-third of the time.

At the conclusion of the experiments, participants were asked why they had gone along with the rest of the group. In most cases, the students stated that while they knew the rest of the group was wrong, they did not want to risk facing personal criticism. A few of the participants were so weak-minded that they suggested that they actually believed the other members of the group were correct in their answers.

These results suggest that conformity can be influenced both by a need to fit in and a belief that other people are smarter or better informed. Given the level of conformity seen in Asch’s experiments, conformity can be even stronger in real-life situations where stimuli are more ambiguous or more difficult to judge. For example, a soldier, in attempting to decide if they will fire upon innocent civilians, will be forced to weigh their own risk. If they fail to obey the command to fire upon American citizens, will they face disciplinary action, or even death?

Asch also found that having one of the confederates give the correct answer while the rest of the confederates gave the incorrect answer dramatically lowered conformity. In this situation, just five to ten percent of the participants conformed to the rest of the group. Allies, committed to a central belief, is what drives many in the alternative media to relentlessly pursue the truth and then inform as many people as will listen.

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

The Milgram Experiment and Group Think

The world of psychological research provides the definitive answer as to whether we should fear our military in the coming storm ahead in the form of a phenomenon called group think. Group think is often described as a decision-making process whereby the group members go along with what they believe is the consensus. Group think has also been used to describe individual acquiescence to authority even when the authority has limited power to enforce compliance. Group think often causes groups to make hasty, irrational decisions, where individual doubts are set aside, for fear of upsetting the group’s leadership and balance.

Just how far will people go to please authority figures and subsequently do what they know to be immoral? The first known laboratory test for groupthink occurred in 1963 by Yale professor, Stanley Milgram. Subjects for this landmark study were recruited for the Yale study through newspaper ads and direct mail. The participants were men between the ages of 20 and 50, from all educational backgrounds, ranging from an elementary school dropout to participants with doctoral degrees.

milgram-300x217

Milgram wanted to determine what percentage of people would willingly administer enough progressive electric shocks which would result in death simply based on the orders of a perceived authority figure (i.e., the experimenter).

There were three participants in the experiment:

milgram_experiment

1. The Teacher was the real subject in the experiment. Their role was to administer shocks for each wrong answer provided by the learner. How far they would go, was the true subject of the experiment.  Would they actually kill a person for failing to provide the correct answer on a word pair test? Would they mindlessly follow the orders of the experimenter to continue with the abuse, regardless of the results and obvious harm being perpetrated upon the pretend victim in the experiment?

2. The second participant, the Learner, was actually a plant in the experiment. The Learner would sit in an adjacent room and pretend to be shocked for each wrong answer that they would purposely give. Eventually, they would cry out for help and beg the Teacher to stop administering the electric shocks. Their cries included pleas of mercy that were often based on an unknown level of self-expressed cardiac distress that they were pretending to experience.

3. The Experimenter was a stern looking fellow who carried a clipboard, wore a lab coat, and would urge the Teacher to continue regardless of the make believe pleas of the Learner.

The “Teachers” were told by the experimenter that they would be participating in an experiment to test the effects of punishment on learning. However, as has already been stated, this was not the goal of the experiment.

The “Teacher” was given a list of word pairs which was used to teach the Learner. The Learner was actually a confederate, or a plant, in the experiment. The Teacher would then read the first word of each pair and read four possible answers. The Learner would deliberately press the wrong button to indicate his response. Since the answer was incorrect, the Learner would receive an electric shock, with the voltage progressively increasing with each wrong answer. Therefore, the subjects believed that for each wrong answer, the Learner was receiving an ever increasing level of actual shocks which would eventually result in death.

In reality, there were no shocks. After the confederate (i.e., Learner) was separated from the subject, the confederate set up a tape recorder integrated with the electro-shock generator, which played pre-recorded sounds of pain and distress for each successive level of shock. After a number of voltage level increases, the Learner would bang on the wall which divided him from the subject (teacher). After several instances of banging on the wall and complaining about his heart condition, the learner provided no further responses to questions and no further complaints. The fate of the Learner was left to the imagination of the teacher. The silence was met with the command to continue with the experiment. Although the Learner was not being harmed, the Teacher believed that they were administering progressively dangerous shocks. From the instrumentation panel, the Teacher could clearly see that their shocks were approaching the level of lethality. Was the Teacher being forced to capitulate and continue with the experiment? Quite the contrary was true, the prompts to continue administering shock were encouraged by minimal prompts and absolutely no threats were offered by the Experimenter.

If at any time the subject hesitated or expressed a desire to discontinue the experiment, the subject was given a planned and verbatim succession of verbal prompts by the experimenter:

1. “Please continue.”

2. “The experiment requires that you continue.”

3. “It is absolutely essential that you continue. ”

4. “You have no other choice, you must go on.”

If the Teacher still wished to stop after having listened to four successive verbal prompts, the experiment was discontinued. Otherwise, the experiment was terminated after the subject had administered the lethal 450-volt shock three times in succession.

Milgram expected that less than one percent would actually administer a fatal electric shock. The actual results were so stunning that he decided to film the results on the final day, fearing that nobody would believe his results. And what were the results? Despite expressing some measure of discomfort and the minimal use pressure, in Milgram’s first set of experiments, 65% (26 out of 40) of the subjects administered the experiment’s final and hypothetically fatal 450-volt shock. Amazingly, no participant steadfastly refused to give further shocks before the 300-volt level!

Milgram’s results were confirmed when Dr. Thomas Blass performed a meta-analysis on the results of repeated performances of the experiment. Blass found that the percentage of participants who were willing to administer fatal voltages remains remarkably constant, between 61% and 66%.

The results of Milgram’s and Blass’ work are stunning in their final conclusion which demonstrated that almost two-thirds of all Americans will mindlessly follow the commands of a “perceived” authority figure even when the authority figure has no real power over the people. Can you imagine how the 65% rate will dramatically climb when they authority figure had “real” power over the people being ordered to fire upon American citizens?

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

The Zimbardo Prison Study

In 1971, psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues set out to create an experiment that looked at the impact of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. Zimbardo, a former classmate of Stanley Milgram was interested in expanding upon Milgram’s research. He wanted to further investigate the the impact of situational variables on human behavior.

The research question the researchers asked was how would the participants react when placed in a simulated prison environment? Zimbardo had previously speculated that, “Suppose you had only kids who were normally healthy, psychologically and physically, and they knew they would be going into a prison-like environment and that some of their civil rights would be sacrificed. Would those good people, put in that bad, evil place, or, would their goodness triumph?” The results of the experiment haunt many of us in the psychology field, today, as we ponder how far Americans would go in the enforcement of a brutal and vicious tyranny?

Zimbardo set up a mock prison in the basement of Standford University’s psychology building, and then selected 24 undergraduate students to play the roles of both prisoners and guards.  The assignment of roles was accomplished through random selection. The participants were selected because they had no criminal background, lacked psychological issues and had no major medical conditions. Therefore, the participants in the study were far more psychologically and physically healthy than any force of modern day military, police or FEMA camp guards. The volunteers agreed to participate for a one- to two-week period.

Prisoners were to remain in the mock prison 24-hours a day for the duration of the study. Guards, on the other hand, were assigned to work in three-man teams for eight-hour shifts. After each shift, guards were allowed to return to their homes until their next shift. Researchers were able to observe the behavior of the prisoners and guards through the use of hidden cameras.

The experiment was originally scheduled to last two weeks, but it had to be stopped after just six days due to what was happening to the student participants. The guards became exceptionally abusive and the prisoners began to show signs of extreme stress, anxiety and nervous breakdown.

The prisoners and guards were allowed to behave in any manner they chose. However, the interactions were generally hostile or even dehumanizing. The guards began behaving in an aggressive and abusive manner toward the mock prisoners. Subsequently, nearly all of the prisoners became passive and depressed. Five of the prisoners began to experience such severe and acute anxiety, that they had to be released from the study early.

Zimbardo later wrote in his book The Lucifer Effect that “Only a few people were able to resist the situational temptations to yield to power and dominance while maintaining some semblance of morality and decency; obviously I was not among that noble class” . Even Zimbardo lost his objectivity and the experiment was only halted when his girlfriend at the time, Christina Maslach, a graduate psychology student, voiced objections and threatened to break off her relationship with Zimbardo if the experiment continued.

The Stanford Prison Experiment demonstrates the powerful role that the situation can play in human behavior. Because the guards were placed in a position of power, they began to behave in ways they would not normally act in their everyday lives or in other situations. By putting a prison guard uniform on the participants, issuing sun glasses and a baton made the participant guards act in accordance with their perceived role. This has dire consequences for the ability of uniformed personnel to resist orders from their commanding officers to fire upon American citizens. People will act according to the role that they have been assigned to play. Finally, based upon the Zimbardo Prison Experiment, what kind of treatment could you expect at a FEMA camp?

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

CONCLUSION:

WILL AMERICAN SOLDIERS FIRE ON AMERICAN CITIZENS?

THE EVIDENCE HAS BEEN PRESENTED TO YOU…

 WHAT DO YOU THINK?

kent-state-4

Dave Hodges is the Editor and Host of The Common Sense Show.

THE COMMON SENSE SHOW HAS A NEW LISTENING HOME!

Common Sense

LISTEN SUNDAY NIGHTS FROM 9PM-MIDNIGHT (CENTRAL)

LISTENING INFORMATION

Listen live on Web Stream   http://64.27.20.5:1334/listen.pls

000_nic334155.si.si

 

VERY FEW PEOPLE ARE AWARE OBAMA HAS GIVEN THE ORDER TO FIRE ON AMERICAN CITIZENS ONCE ALREADY!

WHY DON’T MORE KNOW? 

ONLY FOX COVERED IT!

THE FOLLOWING IS ALMOST 8 MINUTES OF THE SCARIEST VIDEO I’VE EVER SEEN AS AN AMERICAN!

DURING THE STANDOFF AT THE BUNDY RANCH, MOST PEOPLE DO NOT KNOW THINGS GOT SO DANGEROUSLY CLOSE TO ESCALATING INTO UNCONTROLLABLE DISASTER, THAT ’BUT FOR’ A MOVIE DIRECTOR AT THE RANCH WHO JUST HAPPENED TO BE DOCUMENTING THE EVENT, WE MIGHT BE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SECOND CIVIL WAR. HECK, I’D BET ON CIVIL WAR, HAD THE MASSACRE THAT OBAMA GREEN LIGHTED TAKEN PLACE!  

LISTEN TO THE BLM SOLDIER IN THE VIDEO. HE SAYS THEY HAD A GREEN LIGHT TO FIRE ON THE MILITIA. WHAT IF THIS BRAVE DIRECTOR HADN’T ACTED OUT OF INSTINCT TO DIFFUSE TO THE SITUATION? IS THAT WHAT GOVERNMENT IS HOPING FOR? TO PUSH US OVER THE EDGE? WATCH FOR YOURSELF. BY MINUTE 7 OF AN 8 MINUTE CLIP, I COULD BARELY SWALLOW! IT SCARED ME TO DEATH!!!

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter – have to go to Blog]

Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page

DO YOU THINK THE BLM IS THE ONLY AGENCY THAT WILL FOLLOW THAT ORDER?

THE U.S. ARMY MANUAL HAS INSTRUCTIONS ON WHEN TO FIRE ON PEACEFUL PROTESTORS (IF THEY ARE PROTESTING GOVERNMENT)!!!!

I’ve showed you NUMEROUS TIMES a copy of an older version of the U.S. ARMY TRAINING MANUAL ON ROUNDING UP U.S. CITIZENS INTO DETAINMENT CAMPS. I’ve also showed a COPY OF THE NEW ARMY MANUAL AUTHORIZING LETHAL FORCE AGAINST PEACEFUL PROTESTORS! 

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

Tea Party.org reports: “Jade Helm is a challenging eight-week joint military and Interagency (IA) Unconventional Warfare (UW) exercise conducted throughout Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, California, Nevada, Utah and Colorado,” according to an unclassified military document announcing the training drill, which runs from July 15 through September 15.

Multiple branches of the US military, including GREEN BERETS, NAVY SEALS, and the 82ND AIRBORNE DIVISION will participate in the 8-week long exercise, which may result in “increased aircraft in the area at night.”

The exercises, in which some participants will be “wearing civilian clothes and driving civilian vehicles,” lists Texas and Utah as “hostile” territory.

According to the document, Texas was chosen due to the states’ “historically supportive… efforts to prepare our soldiers, airmen, marines and sailors to fight the enemies of the United States.”

Despite the document’s claims, multiple Army training exercises in the past have specifically targeted such states due to concerns over the growing influence of conservative groups, such as the “Tea Party.”

See the US Army Special Operations Command’s PowerPoint slides regarding the “Realistic Military Training” drills below:

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

TIME TO WAKE THE HELL UP PEOPLE! 

SHARE THIS POST WITH EVERYONE YOU KNOW!

Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page

In an article all the way back on February 8th titled: 160 ARMED CITIZENS CONFRONT TOWN COUNCIL AND SAY: “STAND DOWN,” town residents who’s elected representatives refused to do as their electorate asked of them, found themselves in a very uncomfortable position. Unfortunately, it sounds like it is exactly position the military is training to deal with right now in MOCK CITIES RIGHT OUTSIDE WASHINGTON D.C… 

In the event any Americans DARE stand up for our UNALIENABLE RIGHTS after all hell breaks loose, then Obama or someone else in Big Government will just use the U.S. Army to “take care of them” if need be. My God, the country is becoming a scary place indeed!

This isn’t some fringe paper this article was in. This comes right out of the Washington Times and talks about the U.S. Army killing Tee Party folks. Make no mistake – all those articles I’ve been posting for a year and a half, they are now making their way into mainstream media, and still hardly anyone is speaking a word about it. Instead of People screaming bloody murder, they  continue to ACT as if everything is just fine. 

NEWS FLASH: Everything is NOT fine. You might want to revisit these:

Soldiers

The Washington Times reports: Imagine Tea Party extremists seizing control of a South Carolina town and the Army being sent in to crush the rebellion. This farcical vision is now part of the discussion in professional military circles.

At issue is an article in the respected Small Wars Journal titled “Full Spectrum Operations in the Homeland: A ‘Vision’ of the Future.” It was written by retired Army Col. Kevin Benson of the Army’s University of Foreign Military and Cultural Studies at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., and Jennifer Weber, a Civil War expert at the University of Kansas. It posits an “extremist militia motivated by the goals of the ‘tea party’ movement” seizing control of Darlington, S.C., in 2016, “occupying City Hall, disbanding the city council and placing the mayor under house arrest.” The rebels set up checkpoints on Interstate 95 and Interstate 20 looking for illegal aliens. It’s a cartoonish and needlessly provocative scenario.

The article is a choppy patchwork of doctrinal jargon and liberal nightmare. The authors make a quasi-legal case for military action and then apply the Army’s Operating Concept 2016-2028 to the situation. They write bloodlessly that “once it is put into play, Americans will expect the military to execute without pause and as professionally as if it were acting overseas.” They claim that “the Army cannot disappoint the American people, especially in such a moment,” not pausing to consider that using such efficient, deadly force against U.S. citizens would create a monumental political backlash and severely erode government legitimacy.

The vision is hard to take seriously. As retired ArmyBrig. Gen. Russell D. Howard, a former professor at West Point, observed earlier in his career, “I am a colonel, colonels write a lot of crazy stuff, but no one listens to colonels, so I don’t see the problem.” Twenty years ago, then-Air Force Lt. Col. Charles J. Dunlap Jr. created a stir with an article in Parameters titled “The Origins of the American Military Coup of 2012.” It carried a disclaimer that the coup scenario was “purely a literary device intended to dramatize my concern over certain contemporary developments affecting the armed forces, and is emphatically not a prediction.”

 

The scenario presented in Small Wars Journal isn’t a literary device but an operational lay-down intended to present the rationale and mechanisms for Americans to fight Americans. Col. Benson and Ms. Weber contend, “Army officers are professionally obligated to consider the conduct of operations on U.S. soil.” This is a dark, pessimistic and wrongheaded view of what military leaders should spend their time studying.

A professor at the Joint Forces Staff College was relieved of duty in June for uttering the heresy that the United States is at war with Islam. The Obama administration contended the professor had to be relieved because what he was teaching was not U.S. policy. Because there is no disclaimer attached to the Small Wars piece, it is fair to ask, at least in Col. Benson’s case, whether his views reflect official policy regarding the use of U.S. military force against American citizens.

OPERATION JADE HELM COULD NOT BE MORE REAL! 

TRAINING FOR MARTIAL LAW IS BEING DONE IN 10 STATES RIGHT NOW! 

SEE FOR YOURSELF BELOW

Jade Helm Martial Law WW3 Prep Document 1

THANKFULLY, SPECIAL OPS VETERANS ARE RUNNING COUNTER OPS!

 

By: Voice of Reason

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

 

THE VOICE OF REASON

Treason 3

FOR MORE ON ALL OBAMA’S TREASONOUS ACTS!

Martial Law

FOR MORE LINKS ON MARTIAL LAW:

Prepare

FOR MORE LINKS ON HOW CLOSE THE NATION IS TO INTERNAL WAR:

Fema Camp 1

FOR MORE ON FEMA CAMPS:

 

BE SURE TO CHECK OUT THE GIFT SHOP!

 

 

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 1 comment
  • If one simply reads the 10 or so chapters in the Bible mentioning end-times Babylon, no other nation but America fits ALL the descriptions. Clearly, America is Babylon. The only response for those following Messiah and esteeming the Scriptures is to FLEE. It is a specific command of the Father for those living in end-times Babylon. He makes this command more than once. Ignore it and you will perish. My belief is that living anywhere in the northern hemisphere will be deadly soon. But those living in America will be TRAPPED once the door to flee Babylon is shut. The Word says there will be no surviving humans living there FOREVER. The very few survivors will become abject foreign slaves if they are deemed worthy or attractive. FLEE or perish.

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.