Pentagon: Journalists Classified as ‘Belligerents’ Who Can Be Shot on Sight

(Before It's News)

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

BE SURE TO GO MY PROFILE’S BELOW AT OTHER SOCIAL MEDIA:

FACEBOOK | TWITTER | PINTEREST | STUMBLE UPON | TUMBLER

HERE IS THE NUMBERS FOR EVERYONE IN CONGRESS! PLEASE CALL!

In the video below, DAHBOO777 gives you an introduction to Obama’s newly re-written 2015 Edition of the United States War Manual. I’ll cut to the chase: The new version makes It much easier for soldiers to be able to defend killing JOURNALISTS! I’m sure some of the naive folks out there are scratching their heads asking, “Why would Obama want to kill journalists?” NEWS FLASH: He wants to kill bloggers and citizen journalists, and I will prove it. 

Do you recall what the architect of the Obamacare Bill, Jonathan Gruber, said when he didn’t think anyone was paying attention? Referring to American voters (and the die hard Obama supporters I might add), Gruber said, “call it the STUPIDITY of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really really critical for the thing to pass…”

Allow me to summarize that for you. Said another way, “Thanks to the public schools that have become nothing more than liberal indoctrination centers, and a mainstream media that doesn’t dare challenge the Democrat Party, American voters have absolutely zero facts about anything these days, so they’ll fall for whatever you tell them, and they’ll laugh and point fingers at those who DO know the facts.” First, listen to the video, and let DAHBOO777 send chills up your spine. As you can see compliments of Dave Hodges of the Common Sense Show, shooting journalists is merely the most recent development by Obama and the Fourth Reich.

Oh what? Is that not politically correct for me to say? I tell you what, in case you missed it, we just learned that Obama’s Pentagon has declared JOURNALISTS to be ‘Unprivileged Belligerents’ Who Can Be Shot or Killed on Sight. Below is just a few links as a TINY sample of Obama’s all out assault on the First Amendment (along with all the rest of them). This country was founded on the ability to criticize the government. As you’ll see below the video, Dave Hodges points out the new additions to the Obama Army Manual that call for the shooting of UNARMED AMERICANS for merely protesting the government. Don’t take my word for it, READ IT! I think Obama and the Obama Youth can now begin to start referring to themselves as the Fourth Reich. 

DESTROYING FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS IS NOTHING NEW TO OBAMA:

• Disastrous “Net Neutrality” Rules Begin Now (Video)
• Obama to Limit Free Speech About Guns Now
• Could Obama REALLY BE SPYING On 2/3 of ALL Reporters? ABSOLUTELY!
• Free Speech Internet Will Soon Disappear 
• Senate’s Attack on First Amendment Rights Fails
• Net Neutrality: What it REALLY Means, & How it REALLY Impacts You
• Senator Feinstein (Go Figure) Trying to Take Away First Amendment!           
• Democrats Now Pushing to Regulate “CONSERVATIVE WEBSITES               
• Former Marine Made Fun of Obama on Facebook & Put In Mental Ward
• Obama Is Now Prosecuting Whistle Blowers & “Chilling Free Speech”
• Obama Secretly Signs No Free Speech Bill
• Obama Signs Bill ‘In Secret’ Making FREE SPEECH ILLEGAL!
• OBAMA Signs Anti-Protest Bill – FREE SPEECH can get you JAIL TIME!
• Reporter Who Criticized Obama Reveals What Happened Afterwards
• GOVERNMENT ARRESTING PEOPLE FOR ANTI-OBAMA FACEBOOK POSTS!
• HAD ENOUGH YET? – Democrats’ Push to Criminalize Dissent        

How many times have I SCREAMED about Net Neutrality and how it has NOTHING to do with being neutral? Even liberals might be able to figure this one out for themselves with this most recent development. I’m not even sure the normal IQ of 6 is even required to figure this one out. Maybe NOW that JOURNALISTS can be SHOT on sight, people will pay more attention to what I said about What Net Neutrality REALLY is, and How it Could Affect You. Take one look at the links outlining Obama’s assault on free speech above. Now, do you think the same guy would champion free speech on the Internet? If you do, let me be the first to congratulate you on making it this far in life with an IQ under 3.

Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page

(NaturalNews) Can journalists be considered enemies of U.S. and allied military forces? Absolutely, the Pentagon has declared in a thick, new instruction manual for waging war the “legal” way, and they can thus be targeted.

According to The Washington Times, journalists can also be terrorists, the 1,176-page Department of Defense Law of War Manual states. The book is designed to provide commanders with correct and incorrect ways of killing an enemy of the United States.

The manual says it is okay to shoot, explode, bomb, stab or cut the enemy; surprise attacks and killing retreating troops is permitted as well, though U.S. forces cannot employ poison gases.

The new manual is the first comprehensive, all-in-one legal guide for all four military branches; for decades, the services each had issued their own guides for air, sea and land warfare conduct.

The Obama-era document brushes aside the prior Bush ^Aadministrations label of “unlawful enemy combatant” for terrorist organizations like al Qaeda in favor of a new term: “unprivileged belligerent.”

SPIES HAVE OFTEN POSED AS JOURNALISTS:

But one notable section of the new manual pertains to a definition of journalists and how they are expected to stay out of any fighting.

“In general, journalists are civilians,” the manual says, as cited by the Times. “However, journalists may be members of the armed forces, persons authorized to accompany the armed forces, or unprivileged belligerents.”

Grouping terrorist journos with those from bona fide news outlets and agencies led one officer to describe the paragraph as “odd.” And one civilian lawyer who discusses war crimes cases labeled the wording “an odd and provocative thing for them to write.”

Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page

Michael Rubin, a Middle East expert at the American Enterprise Institute, told the paper that the manual reflects today’s sometimes confusing world of journalism.

“It’s a realization that not everyone abides by the same standards we do,” Rubin said. “Just as Hamas uses United Nations schools as weapons depots and Iran uses charity workers for surveillance, many terrorist groups use journalists as cover.”

Over the decades of the Cold War, Warsaw Pact nations and the Soviet Union often posed undercover KGB and intelligence operatives as journalists. In one infamous case, as reported by the UK’s Telegraph, then-KGB operative Vladimir Putin, now the Russian president, was photographed posing as a tourist during a visit to the Soviet Union in 1988 by then-President Ronald Reagan. Putin, the paper reported, was part of a group of “tourists” who asked Reagan pointed questions about the U.S. human rights record.

The Times noted that Rubin recalled a pair of al Qaeda terrorists posed as journalists to assassinate Taliban leader Ahmad Sha Massoud. Also, Chechen Islamists went on missions with camera crews in tow.

“JOURNALISTS CAN BE COMBATANTS, TOO”

• ISIS Crisis Solved… Crop Dusters.
• Media not allowed to observe controversial Special Operations exercise Jade Helm 15
• FBI Director Says Background Check System Failed, Allowing Alleged SC Shooter to Purchase Gun
• Let’s Abolish Government Debt on Feed 44
• A Reply to Wolfi Landstreicher
• Message For The Leaders of Russia, Greece, Spain and Germany
• What Warren Buffett missed (so far) – thermal underwear!
• DID BILL CLINTON JUST LET SLIP TRUMP ASSASSINATION PLOT?
• What’s better: our health system or my English?
• Bill Clinton Tells Jeb Bush, “This Trump Thing Will Be Taken Care Of.”