| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Leftists Predict Obama To Lose In Appeals’ Court On Friday On Amnesty Ban Dragging Obama Down (Video) Antichrist Down
By King of Shambhala
The Antichrist.
White House Asks Appeals Court for Stay of Judge’s Injunction on Immigration Reforms
Houston, TX (Law Firm Newswire) April 13, 2015 - The Obama administration has upped legal ante in the wake of friction over its revelation on extended work permits.
President Obama’s executive action on immigration has been on hold since a federal district ruling in Texas blocked the administration’s immigration measures. On March 12, the White House elevated the legal battle, asking the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans to issue an emergency stay of the judge’s injunction.
The March 12 request could potentially counter intense opposition that has accompanied a complex case and a recent series of events concerning the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.
Beginning the process on February 16, 26 states argued a lawsuit against the reforms before Judge Andrew S. Hanen of Federal District Court in Brownsville, Texas. Hanen’s ruling effectively froze the progress of Obama’s November 20 executive action, which has been shielding about 4.9 million undocumented immigrants and creating a prioritized system for U.S. border security.
The Justice Department quickly asked to postpone Hanen’s ruling while it appealed, but the judge refused. An emergency stay from the Fifth Circuit, as requested, would achieve this goal.
Then, the legal proceedings became more complex on March 3, after the government revealed to Hanen that one theoretical aspect of the executive action — three-year work permit grants that replace the usual two-year documents — had already gone into effect for 100,000 undocumented immigrants in the United States under the DACA program.
The Justice Department stated that renewals under the DACA program which were processed after November 24 have already been granted the extension.
The Obama administration originally announced that executive action changes would not take effect until, at earliest, February 18, 2015. As such, this revelation has upset many opponents to Obama’s policy changes. The lawyers for Texas — the lead state among the 26 suing the White House — have asserted that the Obama administration misled Hanen when issuing the expanded work permits.
However, the stated timeline may not apply to DACA’s operations in this case. In a memo, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Jeh Johnson announced and ordered the extension when it took effect in November, and it has only been applied to those already eligible for renewal under the existing program. DACA is not new; the Obama administration instituted it in 2012. To counter accusations of deception, DHS officials have stressed that there was never any attempt by the administration to hide its intentions on the extended work permits.
In response to the Justice Department’s statement, Hanen set a March 19 hearing to sort out the facts concerning the extended work permits, which have become a contentious subplot to the larger litigation.
“While there may not have been any intent by the administration to mislead the judge, especially considering the November DHS memo announcing the new guidelines, it is not surprising that the litigants would pounce on this issue,” said Annie Banerjee, a prominent Houston attorney who specializes in immigration law. “And such a reaction is even more predictable because the battle lines in this case have been drawn in a highly partisan manner.”
The same day that the appeal was filed, the Justice Department filed a brief with Hanen. In it, the Department asserted that the White House had implemented the one part of its immigration measures that is not being challenged in the lawsuit – and that the issue itself is irrelevant to whether the March 12 stay should be granted to allow the executive action to proceed, pending appeal.
“Seeing as the Fifth Circuit is a relatively conservative court, the White House is taking a risk in pursuing an appeal in this way,” Banerjee said. “However, the decision does set the stage for the matter to resolved more quickly should the case move on to the Supreme Court, where the administration may find a more sympathetic panel of judges.”
Also this article:
The Appeals Court Panel Considering Obama’s Immigration Policies Is Stacked With Right-Wing Judges
BY IAN MILLHISER POSTED ON APRIL 13, 2015
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is a severely conservative court. Among other things, a panel of the Fifth Circuit once suggested that undocumented immigrants are not entitled to the Fourth Amendment’s protections against illegal searches and seizures. So the fact that a challenge to President Obama’s recently announced programs that could offer relief to nearly 5 million undocumented immigrants is now pending before the Fifth Circuit was always likely to bring bad news for those immigrants.
Nevertheless, the millions of immigrants who planned to seek relief under the administration’s Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) program, and under an expansion of the existing Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program received terrible news on Monday. Two members of the three-judge panel that will decide whether to reinstate these programs areextraordinarily conservative judges. One of them once described himself, admittedly somewhat jokingly, as a former “right-wing activist.”
Judge Jerry E. Smith’s presence on the panel that will hear oral arguments in Texas v. United States on Friday is simply a disaster for the DAPA and expanded DACA programs. Smith, the self-described former right-wing activist, once described feminists as a “gaggle of outcasts, misfits and rejects.” He is one of five judges on the Fifth Circuit who once voted to allow a man to be executed despite the fact that the man’s lawyer slept through much of his trial. In a case involving an obscure provision of the Affordable Care Act, Smith badgered a Justice Department attorney and ordered the department to produce a letter explaining whether they agreed with an inartful statement by President Obama.
….
Obama’s the Antichrist and he’s predicted to self-destruct in the Bible’s Apocalyse prophecy. He’s doing that by this case before the judges where Obama’s his worst enemy. Everything he touches turns into crap everybody knows that by now. Obama’s a loser. A Malignant Narcissist, Obama destroys everything around him because he’s a sick man-boy. Obama’s losing his power by being smacked down over and over by Judge Hanen (see first article for that) on his immigration action. He’ll be revealed when the Third Temple is rebuilt in Jerusalem.
Another Day on the Temple Mount
These short clips were filmed today on the Temple Mount. As has become the daily routine, a small group of Jewish worshipers were followed and hounded by the “Morabiton” – veiled Muslim women who are paid by Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood to report to the Temple Mount each day during the three hours that Jews are allowed onto the Mount, for the sole purpose of making the experience on the Temple Mount as unpleasant as possible for the Jews. As can be seen in these clips, the police are instructed to act only passively toward the Muslim instigators. The presence of a screaming young girl has also become a fixture in recent months. Her tender age and sex render her free from any kind of police intervention whatsoever. But her presence begs the question: Whose child is she? Is her mother one of the burqa clad women also seen screaming at the Jews? Why isn’t she in school? Why have Social Services not intervened? Why is she being educated to hate? Is she the upcoming generation’s face of Islamic tolerance?
The Third Temple & The Islamic Antichrist (Obama) full hd 2015
