Profile image
By Voice of Reason
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Denmark Moves Closer To Implementing the “Mark of the Beast”

Saturday, May 16, 2015 6:09
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)


By: Voice of Reason



The other day, when I re-posted the article titled: BEWARE: ALL AMERICANS WILL BE MICROCHIPPED WITHIN THREE YEARS, I got a fair number of emails and Tweets from idiots who may as well have saved the email, just used a bullhorn, and be yelled, “I’m a low information voter, because I get all my news from headlines, and from Facebook pictures with slogans.”


First of all, the implantable chips already exist. That cannot be argued. Second, DARPA is already implanting soldiers with chips, and third, there is so much factual information in that post from multiple sources, it is almost impossible to dispute the chips are coming… the only debatable point is when. In that way the article reminds me of the following two which were done by well funded research teams and are not the slightest bit “Conspiratorial.” But… a headline reader will be a headline reader… Morons:

Imagine my surprise when I came across this article below saying that Denmark is considering a move toward the “Mark of the Beast.” Aside from the biblical aspect to it, once our government goes to a paperless fiat currency, they have absolute control over everything…. absolutely everything. We think Obamacare is bad, but it will look like Camelot compared to a paperless fiat currency. 



[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter – have to go to Blog]

The Telegraph reports: This story is part of our “Money Lab” series, in which respected figures from the world of finance put forward controversial ideas for improving our personal finances or the economy. We will publish this story in print in “Your Money” this weekend along with the best comments from readers, so have your say below.

A proposed new law in Denmark could be the first step towards an economic revolution that sees physical currencies and normal bank accounts abolished and gives governments futuristic new tools to fight the cycle of “boom and bust”.

The Danish proposal sounds innocuous enough on the surface – it would simply allow shops to refuse payments in cash and insist that customers use contactless debit cards or some other means of electronic payment.

Officially, the aim is to ease “administrative and financial burdens”, such as the cost of hiring a security service to send cash to the bank, and is part of a program of reforms aimed at boosting growth – there is evidence that high cash usage in an economy acts as a drag.

But the move could be a key moment in the advent of “cashless societies”. And once all money exists only in bank accounts – monitored, or even directly controlled by the government – the authorities will be able to encourage us to spend more when the economy slows, or spend less when it is overheating.

This may all sound far-fetched, but the idea has been developed in some detail by a Norwegian academic, Trond Andresen*.

In this futuristic world, all payments are made by contactless card, mobile phone apps or other electronic means, while notes and coins are abolished. Your current account will no longer be held with a bank, but with the government or the central bank. Banks still exist, and still lend money, but they get their funds from the central bank, not from depositors.

Having everyone’s account at a single, central institution allows the authorities to either encourage or discourage people to spend. To boost spending, the bank imposes a negative interest rate on the money in everyone’s account – in effect, a tax on saving.

Faced with seeing their money slowly confiscated, people are more likely to spend it on goods and services. When this change in behavior takes place across the country, the economy gets a significant fillip.

The recipient of cash responds in the same way, and also spends. Money circulates more quickly – or, as economists say, the “velocity of money” increases.

What about the opposite situation – when the economy is overheating? The central bank or government will certainly drop any negative interest on credit balances, but it could go further and impose a tax on transactions.

So whenever you use the money in your account to buy something, you pay a small penalty. That makes people less inclined to spend and more inclined to save, so reducing economic activity.

Such an approach would be a far more effective way to damp an overheated economy than today’s blunt tool of a rise in the central bank’s official interest rate.

If this sounds rather fanciful, negative interest rates already exist in Denmark, where the central bank charges depositors 0.75pc a year, and in Switzerland.

At the moment it’s easy for individuals to avoid seeing their money eroded this way – they can simply hold banknotes, stored either in a safe or under the proverbial mattress.

But if notes and coins were abolished and the only way to hold money was through a government-controlled bank, there would be no escape.

Apart from the control over the economy, there would be many other advantages of a cashless society. Such a system is much cheaper to run than one based on banknotes and coins. Forgery is impossible, as are robberies.

Electronic money is an inclusive and convenient system, giving poor and rural sectors of an economy – where cash machines and bank branches may be few and far between and not all people have accounts – a tool for easy participation in the economy.

Finally, the “black economy” will be hugely diminished, and tax evasion made all but impossible.

Jim Leaviss is head of retail fixed interest at M&G Investments.

*Improved macroeconomic control with electronic money and modern monetary theory, by Trond Andresen of the Norwegian University of Science & Technology




Central Banks Guide writes: Fiat money is currency, which is declared by a government to be legal tender, i.e. it is not backed by a physical commodity and has value solely because a government accepts it for payments of taxes and debts. Virtually, almost all of the world’s currency today is fiat money with the most popular ones being the US Dollar, the Euro, the Japanese Yen, and the British Pound.

The origin of the fiat money system dates back to early 11th century when the Chinese Song dynasty issued paper money subject to be redeemed for gold after three years. In reality, though, the banknotes were never redeemed, which created an enormous amount of inflation due to printing money exceeding production levels, and the system was soon abandoned.

Fiat money has made appearance on the world economic scene on several occasions but it was not until the beginning of the 20th century that its universal application became a topic of serious debates. By this period, most nations already had a government monopoly on printing money, which were to be redeemed in gold upon request. However, with the outburst of World War I and the escalation of military expenditure, governments suspended the redemption of the already printed banknotes. Furthermore, country officials could not be held directly responsible for the eventual negative consequences of creating money with no intrinsic value and as a result, the increased supply of money devalued the currency of the countries.

Following this economic shock, at the Bretton-Woods Conference in 1945, the world’s leading countries decided to take precautionary measures against the frivolous government printing. The US Dollar was pegged to the gold at a fixed rate per troy ounce, and a guarantee to redeem US dollars for gold was provided by the US government. This change proved to be beneficial for the trade balances of countries, but the whole system collapsed 26 years later when, during President Nixon’s fiscal policy reforms, the gold standard was removed. With the US dollar being declared legal tender, the government was again able to print currency in order to support its increasing spending needs. This process combined with the slow economic growth at the time (caused by the Oil Crisis) led to the US falling into one of their most serious financial downfalls – the period of stagflation, which encompassed the whole 70s decade.

Fiat money has been an object of severe criticism ever since its creation. Opponents of the system argue that by not backing up their currency to something tangible, governments facilitate unjustifiable printing of money, which has been proven to generate inflation. Furthermore as the Austrian School of Economics points out, printed money creates an explosion of debt, often mistaken for a symptom of increased economic growth. Instead, they argue, the newly released money is not backed up by any assets or an increase in the productivity of the country which, according to Austrian economists, is the real cause of economic growth.

With fiat money being virtually a government promise for the value of its currency, there exists a possibility that the government may decide to no longer guarantee for its own money (e.g. through refusing to collect taxes in that currency). In such case, the currency may still retain its value if a strong private banking system and consensus among the population are present in the country. An example of this occurred in Iraq right after the Gulf Conflict in 1990. Then, the local government refused to back up for the Iraqi Swiss dinar. However thanks to the support by local banks and the Iraqi people, the currency was still exchanged effectively and did not lose its value.



[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter – have to go to Blog]





[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

Do you believe in the Mark of The Beast?

The Mark of The Beast is something the Bible refers to in the book of Revelation 13:16

It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads

It tells of a time in the probable near future where nothing will be bought or sold without this ‘marking’. It has long been speculated what it will be. A tattoo? An arm band or head band of sorts. Now it seems modern technology has caught up with Biblical prophecy and we can truly grasp what the mark could potentially look like.

An implantable chip in one’s hand. This chip could interact with your body in the doctor’s office. Scan it, and it could tell your blood pressure, blood sugar, heart rate, or any other vital piece of information of medical history.

Go to the store and scan your hand to pay for groceries. It would be connected to your bank account and the amount deducted. No cash. No credit cards. No more fraud.

How far off is this?

Not very. In fact IBM has been getting the public primed for years.

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

IBM has been making its living off organized information before the invention of computers. During World War II they leased punch card machines to the Nazis for their concentration camps. These machines had to be serviced on site monthly. They were punch card systems that corresponded to the number tattoos on prisoners arms.

There was an early mention of RFID chips in the original draft of the Affordable Care Act, but it was found out early on and good citizens like you raised their voices and it was removed.

What this tells us is that it is real, and it’s something we need to be on the look out for in the future again.

Be sober. Be vigilant.

Read the article at Conservative Post here:

I get so tired of people yelling “Conspiracy Theory,” when in fact the reality is they just know NOTHING on the subject. No question the subject is a touchy one, so people seem to find it easier to laugh and point fingers than it is to actually do some research and learn. For someone like me, I’ve been reading books and listening to all kinds of podcasts for years now, so I’ve had the chance to hear people interviewed who were “allegedly” involved in many of these “conspiracy theories.” What I’ve come to find after about 8 years, thousands of pages read, and hundreds, if not thousands of hours of podcasts listened to, is these people are telling the same stories. 


Now either they ALL know each other, and it’s one big hoax, or there is a LOT of truth in what they say since they claim to have first hand knowledge. Many people know the “original” version of Obamacare had a provision for an implacable chip that would be mandatory. It was later removed and never found it’s way into the final version, but PLENTY of experts say you can expect the chips to be mandatory within five years. Do your homework. THE FDA RECENTLY APPROVED A CHIP FOR USE IN HUMANS. That should tell you enough right there. Don’t take my word for it. At first I was told I was nuts about the FEMA CAMPS and I was far from wrong, and just like I was nuts about ChemTrails but it turns out the CIA RECENTLY ADMITTED TO CHEMTRAILS AND TRYING TO ALTER EARTH’S ATMOSPHERE, and just like I was nuts when i talked about HAARP AND WEATHER MODIFICATION, I am right about this. Take it to the bank. 


[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

I have to say, I have met some REALLY stupid people in my life, but politics brings out the worst of them. Armed without a single fact, a person will argue until they are blue in the face. Then, show them the facts disputing what they are claiming, and they will continue to claim they are right anyway. In the legal field that, is known as an “Insane Delusion.” 

I don’t know the first thing about the science behind rocket propelled space vehicles. That doesn’t mean I’m so dumb, that I would say the thought of humans having rocket propelled space vehicles is absurd. Follow that same logic from my Facebook page some time ago:

SOMEONE WRITES TO ME: “You have no idea what you are talking about” – when referring to chipping humans, and an article I posted…

REALLY?? You know how long and how many Google searches I did to find supporting articles? One. Does that mean the article I found is perfectly accurate? No. So, if I am skeptic, like above mentioned boob was (because Obama told him that would never happen), I’d go to a legal library, find a legal encyclopedia (because I know nothing on the subject), and look up FDA. Then try to find anything with VeriChip. In VERY short time, if I can’t find something, I’d ask a legal librarian for help.  



Yes, I know, this talks about Medical Information. It doesn’t talk about tracking humans etc. Allow me to use another analogy? The first computers did simple math and took up a whole room. Need I say more, or do those with IQ’s under 6 get it yet?



On Wednesday, October 9 the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved the use of a tiny computer chip, “VeriChip” for implantation in people. The little computer chip will be implanted into a person’s arm and will hold the patient’s medical history for doctors and hospitals.

Applied Digital Solutions out of Delray Beach, Fla., received the go ahead from the FDA to begin marketing the VeriChip. The computer chip would only be used for medical purposes and would be about the size of a grain of rice.

The procedure to insert the VeriChip would take approximately 20 minutes and would entail the chip to be inserted through a syringe. It would be inserted under the skin and wouldn’t require any stitches to close the incision.

Critics of using the computer chips argue that it would create new avenues to which the confidentiality of medical records could be compromised. However, the VeriChip is said to not contain the actual medical records.

Instead it would have codes that could be scanned and revealed in the doctor’s office or hospital. The code would allow health care providers to gain access to the portion of a secure database that is where the medical records would be stored.

Some the information that providers would be able to get access to would be any known allergies and prior treatments the patient had received. It would be the electronic database and not the computer chip that would updated after each medical visit.

Emily Stewart is a policy analyst at the Health Privacy Project. She has voiced her concerns over the use of the VeriChip. “If privacy protections aren’t built in at the outset, there could be harmful consequences for patients.”

It’s the possible other uses that have also raised a few red flags. Computer chips are already used and implanted in one million pets in order to assist families in locating their missing pets.

The computer chips could also be used to track and monitor a person’s movements and locations. Stewart went on to say that in order to protect someone’s medical information the computer chips should only include the most vital medical information.

Information such as allergies, blood type, information medical workers would need to ensure they could safely do their jobs on a patient they weren’t familiar.

David Ellis is an information technology guru at the Detroit Medical Center sees the benefits to the computer chip. He’s planning to lobby for his medical center to be included in the VeriChip pilot program.

Ellis said, “One of the big problems in health care has been the medical records situation. So much of it is still on paper. It’s part of the future of medicine to have these kinds of technologies that make life simpler for the patient.”

Of course he also believes that only the strongest encryption algorithms should be used in order to block hackers from obtaining the information.

Applied Digital Solutions’ chief executive officer, Scott R. Silverman is one of six executives who have actually had the computer chip implanted. Silverman sees more than just medical uses for the computer chip.

Silverman said it could also be used in employees of such secured facilities as nuclear power plants. The chips would allow the employees at these secure facilities to be tracked throughout the buildings.

If you liked this article and want instant updates of all the celebrity stories, click the Subscribe button. To keep up with everything Kelly writes, follow her on Facebook and Twitter or connect on Pinterest. Find more by Kelly on her website.










This next part of the story is two years old, but unless DARPA is a topic you try to follow regularly (to the extent following DARPA is possible), you probably had no idea when it came out, and probably don’t get why this is a BIG BIG BIG BIG Deal.

Let me give you some background on what DARPA is. I’ve made several references in previous posts that along with D.H.S., FEMA, and HAARP, DARPA is not something you want anywhere near you.

So what is DARPA, and why does its chief going to GOOGLE matter?

DARPA – Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency is:

… an independent agency of the United States Department of Defense (DOD) that focuses on developing cutting edge technology to ensure that the United States remains ahead of its enemies. The organization has contributed a number of technologies to the United States military and the world in general, including the groundwork for the Internet. Many of the workings of this agency are kept concealed from the public, in the interests of keeping its technology under wraps so that it is not exploited by other nations.

The agency was founded in 1958, after the Soviet Union launched Sputnik, the first satellite. The United States government realized that it needed a small, mobile, independent research organization if it wanted to meet threats to American security quickly and decisively. Initially, the agency was called the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA), and it focused on aerospace research and threats to national security such as nuclear testing by other nations.

By 1972, the organization’s mission had evolved, and the government had added “Defense” to the title, turning it into DARPA. It began to focus on looking forward into the future, working on highly experimental technology in small, focused groups. This system continues to be used by the agency today, with it focusing on goal-oriented projects that are intended to improve America’s military and defense systems.

DARPA has a number of divisions that are divided into smaller teams focusing on a variety of issues. Information technology is an important part of its research, for example, as are tools that are used on the battlefield, such as drones, armored vehicles, and communications jamming equipment. The agency also focuses on the threat of weapons of mass destruction, and it counters emerging threats to American security and information awareness. It has many small but very dedicated groups of active researchers and experiments, who may work together for up to five years developing a project and delivering a prototype.

Because DARPA technology is used to protect national security and make the United States more effective militarily, it is largely classified. It is also extremely advanced, since the organization focuses on technological superiority. Periodically, information about agency projects does reach the public, but the details are usually deliberately obscured. Civilians, for example, might be aware that it is working on a cloaking device for camouflaging soldiers, but they will not be aware of the mechanics of the system.

Now that you know what DARPA is, imagine it’s former chief in charge of one of the biggest Research and Development budgets on earth. Still not impressed? Keep in mind the close ties Google and the NSA were shown to have. Now I should have your attention. 


Former DARPA head Regina Dugan now leads special projects for the Google-owned Motorola, and she claims to be very excited about wearable computers.By that she doesn’t necessarily mean something so pedestrianly futuristic as Google Glass or a smartwatch. Dugan means electronic tattoos and pills.

“We got to do a lot of epic shit when I was at DARPA,” Dugan said onstage at D11. But the stuff she is working on at Motorola is pretty cool (and totally creepy!) too:

  • An electronic tattoo that can be used to authenticate a user instead of some flimsy password. It’s made by a company called MC10 that Motorola is partnering with, and Dugan is wearing it on her own arm.
  • Another option in a similar vein: Vitamin authentication. Dugan shows a pill that can be ingested and then battery-powered with stomach acid to produce an 18-bit internal signal. After that, the swallower’s whole body becomes a password.


“This isn’t stuff that is going to ship anytime soon. But it is a sign of the new boldness inside Motorola,” explained Dugan’s boss, Motorola head Dennis Woodside. And Dugan and Woodside claimed that all this is entirely optional; Google is not going to be force-feeding us pills.

“If you want to ensure failure in your innovation, try removing the risks,” Dugan said. “Boredom is the enemy of innovation.”


One person who read this article had the following to say:

Anyone else find it very frightening the ex-DARPA head is now working on Goggle’s secret projects, especially after it’s came out that Google has been in bed with the NSA & handing over user info for government spying programs? The stuff that’s going on screams 1984 crossed with an Isaac Asimov sci-fi, combining the world of thought crimes & always watching big bro with future tech that can read your thoughts & instantly doll out appropriate punishment via implanted control chips inserted at birth. Or real “Smart Water” with active nano-bots programmed to do various insidious tasks. Or even the now mundane idea of the “mark of the beast”, but with a high tech twist via the interactive tattoo that Dr. D is sporting in the above photo, necessary for transactions in daily life from buying & selling goods & services to starting your car & opening the door to your house.

Welcome to the future, jump in, the water’s fine!

Read the article at the L.A. Times Here


The mere mention of the issue of implanting RFID chips in humans, like the ones already used in dogs and other animals, leads many to instantly view the issue as a tin-foil hat, outside of the mainstream, conspiracy theory story. But could it really be true that the Obama Regime wants us all to have these RFID chips implanted with our complete medical records and other information stored on them? Let’s put on our tin-foil hats and look into the issue. Shall we?

But what would many think when a mainstream news outlet such as NBC predicts that humans will be implanted with RFID chips by 2017? Here is the video, which clearly Brian Williams of NBC news predicts that we’ll be using these RFID chips by 2017. Click here to watch and listen.

This article in a publication called The PCMD Gazette, which also featured the NBC video, claims the chips will be used by 2017, and also claims they are mandated in H.R. 4872, more commonly known as ObamaCare, and even gives this link to the legislation from the web site of the House of Representives of Congress. The article says the part of ObamaCare that it claims is about RFID chips begins on page 1014 of the ObamaCare legislation.

Part of the language of 1014 of ObamaCare makes reference to “(i)a class III device; or (ii) a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life sustaining.” This to me sounds like an implanted device given to some, for medical necessary for survival, such as a heart pacemakers or maybe a device installed for a Type I diabetic to administer insulin directly into the blood stream. So maybe this is not really about implanting RFID chips?

If I were in the position of authority in the government to interpret this provision, and the accompanying regulations, I would say it’s not about RFID chips. But does this therefore debunk the claims that the Obama Regime might use this to require all of us to get implanted RFID chips? No, because we know this Regime is completely lawless, and will interpret any law, or provision of the Constitution to mean what they want it to mean, or they will just outright ignore and violate the law and the Constitution.

The bottom line is, if the Obama Regime wants to cite this and use it as their “authority” to hand down an executive order requiring all citizens get RFID chips, they will just do it, as they have done any number of other things including the recent implementation of carbon taxes by executive order, or the “dream act” provisions to enact amnesty by executive order, or Obama’s illegal firing of the CEO of General Motors during the federal bailout of two of the three domestic automakers.

Obama or a future progressive president elected from the far left by try to do this. It will be up to the people to resist and then vote out of office any politician that was part of making this happen, if it ever does happen. I have my doubts that they will require it. I think the medical industry will sell people on it, selling them on all the alleged advantages, and medical insurance companies will eventually make it a requirement of the terms of medical insurance coverage. I can see a future were most will voluntarily get implanted. Since the government likely believes it will get most to accept the RFID chip voluntarily, they won’t use force to mandate it. Will they use fraud to try to scam the non-compliant into getting one implanted? That’s another question also.

Read the article at the Examiner here:


By: Voice of Reason









Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.